hi. you aren't at the first changeset in OSM … yet … what is it that you've been mapping? 17 of these "buildings" are less than 5m². 9 less than 3m². (in "imperial" units, that's respectively 54 and 32 square feet).

I would have delimited the area and asked for assistance on how to tag it, or left it to local OSM users.

https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/6397181

hi. I don't know if you have the time, but edits by this user look associated to this other one: CindyPacey3377. maybe not, just my impression.

hi. I'm going to remove the name for this building. :-)

hola, welcome to OSM, thanks for your contributions. please remember to "square" the buildings you add (generally buildings have 90° corners).

https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/16/f4/d9/b3/20190325-180532-largejpg.jpg

moreover, you and your team have been mapping and validating using quite obsolete aerial photography: in the changeset you mention Maxar. As far as I see, the buildings you confirmed in the changeset match Bing, and don't agree with Maxar.

hola HOT validator. there's something wrong going on here. your changeset comment states "adding buildings", and that you're in the "third pass validation" step.
yet, you're mostly editing natural cover information, contributed by local mappers.
have you checked with them? the community is small and at least Charlie Plett is easily found online, just look for him.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/113358149

gpspilot1, seven of your first ten changeset are exemplarily commented. you could go back to your initial practice, please?

it would be good if the author found the time to examine their practices, because this same mistake (mixing changes in Somalia and in North America) was repeated in
changeset/120994369, changeset/121497254, changeset/121643213

commenting style could be improved, too. :-)

same issue with changeset/120994369

(I'm collecting examples hoping that the author will find them helpful, to understand where things went wrong.)

reviewing edits in Panama, I noticed this changeset, and from the history of the author I understand that this is just a mistake, mixing changes in Somalia with changes in the USA. author had made the same mistake in changeset/121497254, which did not cover Panama. ;-)

hola. estás muy seguro que esa calle se llame "Mangüito", con dieresis?

hola. just to make sure … you're mapping the waterway as `river` because of the volumetric flow, not because the state calls it a "río". many things here are born as "Río" but all rivers all over the world begin as a tiny stream and get the "river" classification only a bit downstream.

hola. pregunta sobre el nombre de la calle "Alzira". se ve un poco raro. verdad está bien?

way/180599789

hola y gracias y cuidado con las tildes. es cierto que lastimosamente los documentos del censo no respetan las normas oficiales, y dejan de indicar las tildes, sin embargo, es nuestro oficio añadir nombres de la forma correcta. en este caso: "Marañón".

https://www.rae.es/espanol-al-dia/tilde-en-las-mayusculas

oops. Caño, quite possibly, not Cano nor Canó.

aha, ok, I see it. at a certain point, where you mapped it, the lanes do get physically separated by an important curb. that's good then. thanks for the feedback and links!

a very late hint, hoping that Kaart still receives this. you might want to pay more attention to Spanish spelling. local people aren't used to criticize "the colonizing power" ;-) so they will not tell you, but you really should put the tonic accent where it belongs. for example here, you added a "Sastreria Chavez Peluqueria", which should be written as "Sastrería Chávez Peluquería", but you also missed it on "Clínica" (Maestre) and "Billetón".

hi. are you really positive this link is as you mapped it? you can confirm it's a separate road, not just a lane?