Hi. Thanks for pointing this out. I deleted the name from the building and road ( the ways connected with that road was modified by another user using local knowledge and I'm assuming it's correct without name).

Hi. I saw that you edited this intersections. You left a small way unconnected with anything way/598350973. Can you please take a look over this? If you want, I can modify it, but I will appreciate if you can share the source that you used, because is not visible on Esri World Imagery

Hi. I edited way/125083416, based on Mapbox/Bing/OpenStreetCam there should be a exit from express lane to Harbor Freeway. I would like also to see if the signpost destination is still correct, but I couldn't find any sign with "West 182nd Street". Can you please take a look on this?

Hi, Do you know if this area is still under construction?

Hi. I couldn't find any information about the way/425562501 and way/425562502. I would like to know if this is still under construction. Or if you have any information regarding this. Many thanks

Hi. I know it was 5 year ago, but I was thinking if you are a local maybe you know some available open source data.

Hi. I saw that you added the road name for some of the roads ( Melting Snow Way).
Do you have any information about the roads in this area? Because I saw on satellite imagery that are now finished but I don't have the information about the road name

Many thanks for your answer. I was looking on the OpenStreetCam images, and I saw that in an image from Dec 11th, the road was navigable http://internal.openstreetcam.org/details/984139/1120

Oh, Great. Many thanks!!

Hi, you added here 2 restrictions. I know that your edits are based on survey, but taking in consideration the turn lanes ( from Bing), my intuition is saying that these 2 Turn restriction shouldn't be there. Can you please confirm this?

Hi. I would like to be sure that this road( way/65056326 ) is affected by the surrounding construction project and this is the reason why it doesn't have a highway tag. Is this correct?

Hi. Thanks for the observation. I didn't know that osmand doesn't interpret correctly the via nodes. I split the ways where the links started, hope this will fix the problem. However shouldn't that be also revolved on the routing side? maybe there are also other restriction in this situation.
Marina

Hi. I agree with you. Shouldn't be residential. I was thinking that should be track roads (highway=track). They are unpaved and in the forest. What's your opinion?

Hi. I saw that you added the tag service=logging on many roads in this area. As far as I know, this tag is not supported by OSM. If you are using this, I don't want to lose this info, but can we find an other way to map this? Like an area maybe ( landuse=logging) or as a note ( usage= ). What do you think?