Dear Marc, thank you for Your attention! I think it was one situation with lost Internet connection. Recently I don't have free time to do mapping, hope to come back in few months. So, feel free to change the bugs. With best greetings from Erlangen! Marek

Poprawiłeś świat na lepszy, pozdrawiam!

ul. Łaska to ulica przy której stoi ten kosciół. Wystarczy zerknąć na dowolną mapę! Mieszkalem na tej ulicy niedaleko kosciola. :-)

Thanks Dimitar, done. Just one parameter copy paste bug.

Dear all, please remove both nodes with swapped lat and long, I tried it in iD.
Thanks and regards,
Marek

The same to you! Happy mapping! Marek

Take a look at the optimized situation. There was no river anymore and the old sand field is already used for agriculture. I deeply suggest you to learn JOSM. Best regards and thank you for your contribution!

Thank you for your mapping dear Aglis IRM-ED, plase feel free to make changes! Best regards, Marek

Yes, for few months: We will estimate data amount in one high detailed tile (which is still in mapping) and decide how many subtiles we need for end-user purposes (people they work in local admin units in Nepal). Could be, we leave this concept but we need proof first.

This is one part of nepali free government datasheet. We discuss with nepali community import of those fields for all Nepal with goal to make OSM data more usable for nepali Ordnace Survey. Specification, discussion, wiki page comes soon. For now only this one rectangle is imported. And of course, we need one osm compatible tagging for those "cryptic" description.

Exactly!

Dear Pradeep,
it is great to see so eager and good quality mapping, thank you for that! But I have one technical notice.. Please stop to use only hashtag description for edits. This is contrary to the international conventions which allows hashtags but prefer description of content: osm.wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets and: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards, Marek

Dear Friend,
it is great to see so eager mapping but.. Please stop to use only hashtag description for edits. This is contrary to the international conventions which allows hashtags but prefer description of content: osm.wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets and: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards, Marek

Dear Sandip,
It is great to see so eager mapping but.. Please stop to use only hashtag description for edits. This is contrary to the international conventions which allows hashtags but prefer description of content: osm.wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets and: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards, Marek

It is great to see so eager mapping but.. Please stop to use only hashtag description for edits. This is contrary to the international conventions which allows hashtags but prefer description of content: osm.wiki/Changeset#Tags_on_changesets and: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Best regards, Marek

Dear Mapper, plz go in touch with danieldegroot2 . My comments, please stop to use description like
#hotosm-project-10857 #SAKSHAM #NepalYIL #DRRYLF2021 #DigitalaVolunteers #BIPAD

Better to use human like language: Remapping of ways for hotosm-project-10857 in team of Nepali DigitalaVolunteers. Note #SAKSHAM #NepalYIL #DRRYLF2021 #BIPAD

Absolutely yes! Best greetings! Marek

Thank you for fixing of not connected points of boundary. I haven't seen that. Bad thing. Nepal has very unformal definition of boundaries, always based on existing ways or waterways or, in mountains on mountain peeks. Nepal has only very generalized digital map based on old sources from 1995. This means in reality: Map elements are often not existing (not existing ways) or up to 250 m in wrong position. We saw it often during Project Ilam (see Wiki). So, may I invite you to the corrections of boundaries in the sense of the existing law? The information source are employees of Ordnance Survey Kathmandu, namely their Chief Officer and his Vice during our talk with Dr. Nama Budhathoki in Kathmandu.
Even the first boundaries drawn by our german and polish collegues are only the first estimation.

Danke sehr!

Ich kann mich nicht entsinnen diese gelöscht zu haben. Wenn ja, kann man doch mit JOSM undelete durchführen.