OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
160795661

Het pad bestaat, maar is privé.

De DWG is in contact met de eigenaar.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

112837238

Hi,
What is your source/reason to add an IT office at that location?
We have received a complaint about it.

Best regards,
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

153416507

But then surface=concrete is a much better tag in that situation.

Wiki:
"The value of the key is used to indicate the type of the bridge. See the detail of the known types below. "

bridge=*

Marc.

160367343

Prima, ik woon er vlakbij, maar dan hoef ik het niet in de gaten te houden.
Marc.

160367343

Hallo jack,
Geldt het eenrichtingsverkeer niet voor de gehele Zalbommelstraat? Het eerste stukje heb je aangepast, maar het deel na de Warmellaan staat nog op tweerichtingsverkeer.
Groet,
Marc

159165872

Hi,
You have tagged 71 buildings with:
building=#hotosm-project-17997 #CanCross #CRC #MissingMaps #MissingMaps_DRK #redcross

What kind of tag is that for a building?
Did you check this:
osm.wiki/Map_features#Building
Please improve your tagging!
Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

113464959

Hi,
You changed building=yes to building=ew
way/154404434
What does building=ew stand for?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

118137392

Hi Henri97,
way/1037399959
building=path is very weird.
What did you want to tag there?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

59388889

Is there really a shop in the middle of that field?
node/5651157557

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

157954008

node/9860129159
natural=8-495-495-91-10
What is that supposed to indicate??

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

151478332

Hola kapazao,
Veo que marcaste todas las ediciones inexactas de jamesks con un "fixme".
¿Supongo que la intención es eliminar el fixme una vez que se hayan hecho las correcciones ?
Saludos,
Marc.

62691815

Hi,
here:
way/626380566
you have indicated building=track on a man_made=silo.
What did you want building=track to mean?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

6555275

Hi Michael,
here:
way/88063824
and here:
way/91896421
you have:
building=track

What is that supposed to indicate?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

91915396

Hi,
way/854674631
building=track
What is that supposed to indicate?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

51651350

Hi,
way/520616664
building=track

What is that supposed to indicate?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

127883344

Dank!

102705841

Inderdaad, had vergeten naar de historie te kijken. Maar die Nathan was 6 jaar geleden voor het laatst actief!
Ik denk dat ik er maar gewoon building=yes en description=shops van maak.
Marc.

159968637

disused:amenity=fuel
is all that is needed for such objects.
See this:
osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix

What I try to change is wrong spelling of tags or wrong use.
I cannot see if something is not in use anymore, but therefor we need local mappers (but with the right tools, like the life cycle prefix).

And you can always add the amenity=fuel to the "building:use=residential".

Marc.

127883344

Beste Joost,

Bij verschillende imports van jouw hand kom ik tegen: building=sh.
Ik denk dat je building=shed bedoelt, maar weet dat niet zeker.
Kun je er nog eens naar kijken?

Marc.

102705841

Beste Joris,
way/439025611
Hier gaan 2 dingen fout:
building=sh (onbekend wat je bedoelt)
name=Shops (onjuist gebruik van de name=* tag, gebruik de description=* tag voor de omschrijving van wat iets is).
osm.wiki/Names

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group