Thanks for your reply.
I changed a lot of the same error, and sometimes the amenity=fuel was indeed already set.
I just wanted to show that building=fuel_station is not correct (it's not a valid entry in the wiki) and that it always needs the company of the amenity=fuel, next to the building=yes/roof.
It is most likely a roof!

Marc.

See:
https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416

See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416

see: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416

See: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/typo-correction-building-pavillon-building-pavilion/122416

Hi PPete2,
way/1228046965
Don't you think that leisure=bandstand is a better tag for this object? (instead of building=bench)
osm.wiki/DE:Tag:leisure%3Dbandstand

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi,
way/1298127364
bridge=beton is not a recognized value for bridge.
What did you want to tag?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi,
way/1168784899
bridge=beton is not a recognized value for bridge.
What did you want to tag?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

node/9859941188
natural=8-495-495-91-10
What do you mean with that?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi,
You are using many times natural=diff
like here:
way/1300714977

What is that supposed to indicate?
Did you mean natural=cliff?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

way/1197455324

landuse=ma ?
What was your intention to map there?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

fixed: building=yes

Hello,
Here:
way/1231365469
you have building=e
What is the meaning of that?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi,
Why did you tag all the individual trees as forest?
Read this:
osm.wiki/wiki/
Tag:natural%3Dtree
And conjunto cerrado should NOT be tagged on the buildings but on the area surrounding the buildings.

¿Por qué has etiquetado todos los árboles individuales como bosque?
Lee esto:
osm.wiki/wiki/
Tag:natural%3Dárbol
Y conjunto cerrado NO debe ser etiquetado en el edificio, pero en el están rodeando los edificios.

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

Hi,
You have labeled 70+ buildings with an invalid tag for a building.
Please check this:
building=*
What type of building did you want to map?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillon", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?
If one searches in the OSM wiki for "pavillion", you are being asked: do you mean "pavilion"?
If (and it might be true) that there is an other type of building, named "pavillon (tagged first in 2017, and it is indeed in my German dictionary) then there should have been a wiki describing it, and that wiki should also point out the differences between a "pavillon" and a "pavilion".
If I understand flohoff well, then this is correct:
changeset/159783974 (because I changed pavillion to pavilion)
but this one is not correct:
way/483419854 (because I changed pavillon to pavilion )

Worldwide I found 48 occurences of pavillion.
Worldwide I found 47 occurences of pavillon.
(And worldwide I found 14491 occurences of pavilion).

I did not change all of the pavillion/pavillon occurences to pavilion because I didn't have the time, as I visit all those (in my opinion typos) one by one to check what I change, and if it has the tag building=pavillon/pavillion I changed it to building=pavilion for reasons I have explained already.

If there should be a valid building=pavilion AND a valid building=pavillon in the wiki (and on OSM), then we are 7 years late.

I shall follow the discussion (started by flohoff) on the forum.

Marc.

I have added a page to the wiki to describe my action.
osm.wiki/Talk:Tag:building%3Dpavilion#Typing_error_with_name

I assumed that people using "pavillon" instead of "pavilion" simply made a typing mistake.
E.g. using "railway_staton" deliberately to describe something different then a "railway_station" is an example of bad practice in my opinion.

And btw. it wasn't an automated mass edit but I visited all occasions one by one to do the change in good faith as I considered it (and still do) a "typo"
If people do want to use "pavillion" and "pavillon" next to (the wiki described) "pavilion", there should be a mechanism preventing them for doing so. Unfortunately there isn't.
Marc.

way/221753874

What do you mean with that?
You have drawn a line and tagged that with building=hou?

Marc Zoutendijk
OpenStreetMap Foundation
Data Working Group

I found a number of them. All deleted?
Marc.