I agree, it would be ideal to unify the geomorphological areas on both (all) sides of the border - their boundaries and their names - but I am afraid it is not going to be easy in all cases. AFAIK boundaries of these units do not nicely meet at the borders, as there does not seem to be a standard that would allow scientists in different countries to arrive at a consensus. Maybe I am wrong, but that was the case years ago, when I was interested in this issue. There seems to be also differences in tagging (not surprising though). Compare boundaries and tagging here https://www.freemap.sk/#map=10/49.566309/19.665527&layers=O&osm-relation=1757596 and here https://www.freemap.sk/#map=11/49.521648/19.479446&layers=O&osm-relation=1934507

I did not add the "natural" tag, maybe ask the person who did. I would note though that the tag value falls into the "custom defined" category, and there are plenty of instances of the "mountain_range" value in the db. https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/tags/natural=mountain_range

... and the name of the area is called Tatry in Slovakia, so am not sure what are you asking for.

bol som pri tom ked som to editoval? :-) malo by to byt opravene

Hi, I will fix this. Thanks for heads up.

Diskusia na tuto temu (presnost zdrojov ako su kataster a Ortofotomozaika) prebehla v minulosti na fore OSM Slovensko. Myslim, ze to bola tato: https://groups.google.com/g/osm_sk/c/kj0whFgqnZ0/m/CS8A4wGkAQAJ

neviem odkial je ta informacia, ze polohy budov su v katastri presnejsie ako obkreslovanim z Ortofotomozaiky, kedze moje skusenosti su presne opacne. Mam na mysli tu verziu, ktoru pripravil frremap: tms:https://ofmozaika.tiles.freemap.sk/{zoom}/{x}/{y}.jpg
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/124424759

mas pravdu, ref je iny, nie len symbol, takze nova relacia je ok. Asi by bolo vhodne este dat tie dve relacie do jednej spolocnej superrlacie, alebo ako sa ten koncept vola. Nikdy som to vsak nerobil.

aha, to je pravda ze na vyhliadku je 5729 znacena inym symbolom, ale pochybujem ze je vhodne len kvoli tomu robit novu relaciu. Mozes otvorit temu na fore - ak bude konsenzus ako to znacit, tak to mozme zmenit

tri znacene tur. chodniky vedu k rozhladni. Pre vsetky existuju zvlast relacie a maju spravny osmc:symbol, takze stale nechapem.

Trosku konkretnejsie by to neslo Filip? Nechapem

Hi. This changeset contains buildings drawn on top of existing ones. See for example here:

way/1063976725

Can you explain this issue?

Ahoj. Nevylucujem, ze sa nestalo, ze som niekde nespravne aplikoval tag pedestrian, ale podla mna na tej komunikacii, ktorej link si uviedol je to spravne. Auto tam prejde (vozi truhly), ale inak je to pre pesich.

opravene. Dakujem za upozornenie

dakujem za upozornenie. Nevedel som, ze je to problem. Mate link kde je ozrejmene preco je lepsie v tomto pripade nepouzivat relaciu? Myslel som ze je to jedno.

Dakujem za upozornenie. Smernik som presunul (skopiroval) z cesty na oddedely nod, ale tagy som zabudol vymazat. Opravene.

Takze takto. Na tento [1] (a susedny, ktoreho link neuvadzam) som "designated" tag pridal ja, ale asi preto, lebo som (priznavam, ze slepo) skopiroval uz existujuci subor tagov so susednych usekov [2].[3], kam si ich povodne dal ty. Pozrel som si aj dalsie useky trailu a tam uz vidno len tebou pridane tagy. Myslim teda, ze by si to asi mal opravit ty (a ked uz si tam, tak prosim ta aj tie moje). Asi by som odporucal ten trail dat cely do relacie.

[1] way/896906650/history
[2] way/868533909/history
[3] way/265293666/history#map=15/49.2931/18.2645

Ahoj. "Krptik" je nespisovne, ale krasne slovo a myslim ze tym myslis "kyptik" - teda nieco kratke, co odniekadial trci. :-) Ak sa nemylim, tak ano - ten, ktoreho link uvadzas som do mapy doplnil ja. ...a bicycle=designated tag na tom pridanom useku nevidim. Usek som presiel minulu zimu na bezkach a asi som tam videl cestu/chodnik odbacajucu od singlaca. Podla LIDAR-u tam naozaj nieco je.

Hi kimambogh. The buildings in this changeset are not rectangular, even though the source aerial imagery suggests that they should be. When drawing rectangular buildings, please use the JOSM building tool. Optionally you can make any polygon rectangular by selecting it and hitting the key "q" on the keyboard.
See this page for more info: osm.wiki/JOSM/Plugins/BuildingsTools

Takto to zvycajne robievam, ale nerobil som to tak vzdy. Ak je takychto pripadov viac, tak prosim uviest ich adresy a ja to opravim.

... tak ako v [1], aj v tomto pripade rovnaka otazka: s bicyklami sa tam nesmie? Preco bola tagu bicycle dana znacka "no"?

[1] changeset/100291810