Why is it discouraged? Discouraged by whom?

`area:highway=` are non-routable because they must contain a `highway=`. There is a very clear consensus on using `area:highway=` for this kind of paths: https://community.openstreetmap.org/t/clarification-of-footway-area-mapping/130974/44

1. Please remove `placement=left_of:1` when moving a way to its centreline way/1178516528
2. Usually, `area:highway=` is preferred over `area=yes` + `highway=` when the area is largely linear way/1486486342

Please don't do curved turning paths. changeset/178483495

If you disagree, I think it would be better to discuss somewhere else (e.g. on Discord) first, instead of ignoring previous comments and doing things your way anyway.

1. Feels like a descriptive name, are you sure?
2. Do you have an osm-compatible source for the geometry?

Ok, from newer bus videos I can see the signs. Really didn't expect the signs to be erected a few months after the hospital opens.

Apologies for the wrong accusation.

Do you happen to have any photos of the signs? Because I really can't spot them.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wGv6o1GnR9g&t=145s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHiwyppz7GQ&t=350s

Are you sure about the two left-turn-only relations? I can't see anything in the pics I took during my surveys. Can't see any restrictions in recent bus videos either.

You entered "map.gov.hk" as a source.

Please note the following:

1. Do not use government maps (or any other copyrighted maps) for editing osm. This is a copyright infringement.
2. Do not delete then recreate an identical object. This makes it difficult for future mappers to check the history. Simply edit the geometry and tags. osm.wiki/Keep_the_history
3. If a building is in fact rectangular in real life, please press Q after drawing the building to make it rectangular.

I doubt way/1167317707 is on an embankment.

Ok the Symphony of Lights will be discontinued soon so we can observe the situation and delete it.

If it's fine to be that close to the Developments surely it's not too tight to e.g. Hsin Kuang Centre. But I'll wait for more details on Discord first.

Wow. That's very unexpected. Mind sharing exactly how you came to this result? Specifically, I have some doubts as the new curves are too far away from way/950181594 , and would block the Chuk Yuen Village Developments.

Bus terminus crossings usually have yellow stripes; is this really unmarked?

And still you should have used something like notes instead of adding a fictional POI.

There's `access=private` for maintenance only, and `trail_visibility=no`

Well, you've said it: it's a TRAIL for maintenance, so not no trail. Things can have purposes other than hiking. `access=private` is sufficient. And this is obviously not `tourism=attraction` anyway.

What? Personal bookmark?

Jetbridges for gates 47-50 and 70 didn't get `access=`, is this simply an editing omission?