Hello Jyunhou, I use GNS data to add missing towns and townships in China to osm; the data sometimes includes alternative names which I just deposit under the alt_name tag ;) Feel free to remove the wrong ones...

You're welcome ;)

Please be very cautious when editing county and town boundaries: the relation for 阳江市 relation/3032037 has now gaps and isn't a closed way anymore - I'll try to fix it...

Hello,

Do you know if 乌桥街道, 新福街道, 永祥街道, 海安街道 and 金厦街道 in Shantou still exist? http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjsj/tjbz/tjyqhdmhcxhfdm/2020/44/05/440511.html does not list them anymore - last listed there for 2018...

Bildirim için teşekkür ederim ;)

Adı değiştirdim, bugün yarın gözükecek...

Fixed - thanks for notification ;)

Hello HolloWorld, You've tagged lots of 'grave yards' around here: node/5824763178 ... A graveyard is an area of graves or tombs so may be you should tag them all as cemetery=grave (see osmwiki) and tag the whole area as amenity=grave_yard + landuse=cemetery. It's a huge area - doesn't it have a name?

Thanks for editing in 柘荣县 ;)

I don't know mapwith.ai indicating the use of "Artifical Intelligence" but you've used RapiD 1.0.7 to tag all ways as "residential" (usually convenient inside residential areas like villages or towns). - this is unfortunately not very suitable because I also see ways which I would tag as track, unclassified or tertiary.

I recommend reading osm.wiki/Zh-hant:Key:highway for guidelines how to tag highways ;)

Some survey points seem to be in the sea - for example node/5614899467 - correct ?

;)

Thank you. I had a controlling look and refined part of the road (ways 873351159 and 873351161) according Maxar Premium near Bản Đô (connected unconnected residential roads, added a stream, added 2 bridges over the stream).

Good - I thank you :D

ok - you've already fixed it, thanks :)

ich sehe oben "created_by JOSM/1.5 (14620 de)", das heißt, wir können auch deutsch reden ;)

Mesela "Kevenalanı Yaylası" - node/6239510046 - bir tane ev yok yani orada yaşayan insan yokken place=hamlet bence doğru değil...

Yaylaların adları ve konumları HGK'den geliyor mu?

Şoyle gösterim: http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/ZPd

Bir tane ev bile yoksa bence locality kullanmak lazım; 1 ev varsa isolated_dwelling; eğer bırkaç ev varsa hamlet bence doğru - Karadeniz bölgesinde baya köy gibi büyük yaylalar rastladım bile fakat köy statüsü yok onların - acaba neighbourhood doğru olabilir ?

Eklediğin yaylaları çoğu köy (village) olarak etiketledin fakat place=locality veya isolated_dwelling daha doğru. Mesela [Bakıroluğu Yaylası](node/6239510034)'sında bir tane ev bile bulunmuyor...

Bunun gibi yerler bu sitede görüntüleniyor: https://resultmaps.neis-one.org/unmapped#11/38.1105/36.0928

Tak skal du have:D

Have you been there recently?

Hopefully correct ;) I would have to walk there with a GPS device for a controlling survey... :)

By the way: Maxar Imagery is a bit newer than Bing Imagery; they also differ in an offset...

The status of being a National Park has unfortunately been removed by the government to be replaced by a so-called Kapadokya Alan (relation/9986530) but since the area is still listed in several wikipedias the area hasn't been removed (see https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Göreme_Tarihî_Millî_Parkı and discussion on https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tartışma:Göreme_Tarihî_Millî_Parkı - in Turkish) :/

Looks ok so far; I've just changed way-type to residential and one way was crossing over a building which I've fixed too ;)