Ok - but you don't need to notify me if you change single nodes... ;)

Nonetheless I had a controlling look and noticed a crossing waterway section of way way/478648001 with your way near node node/668101314 which I've fixed.

Good :) 3 years ago there was no Maxar Premium imagery available...

No need to notify me but thank you ;)

Thank you ;) Back in 2017 there was no maxar imagery yet and imagery wasn't very good in North Vietnam as far as I can remember...

Ha! Tamam! josm'de sadece en son 2019'un uydu görüntüsü bulunuyor...

Ilısu Baraj Gölü hemen doldu mu? Allah allah! Kanıtlayabilen uydu görüntüsü göremedim ama... ;)

O zaman su altında kalan köyleri hemen taşınması gerekecek: Kaşüstü, Balıklı, Kelekçi, Çattepe vb...

If you've got some spare time could you eventually refine your 3-year old rough outlined ways in Pingle County and Lipu City using maxar Premium imagery?

It seemingly has no influence anyway as one sees on the standard layer where it gets mixed; the humanitarian layer shows water over heath ;)

There also exists relation/9396582 as 'heath' which partly overlays the dry lake - I guess I'd chosen to add layer=-1 to let the heath render above the lake. I've never been there therefore I cannot tell anything about the on-ground reality ;)

So what shall we do with this multipolygon?!?

Razed is possible too, but I don't know the exactly when to use what. Additionally I've never been there ;)

Abandoned means that the iron rail track is still visible but one never sees a train passing there.

Feel free to change it :)

I see ;) - one could then maybe rather tag it "proposed:landuse=industrial" (see proposed=* )

hm - using maxar imagery the area looks rather 'natural' than 'industrial' - can you confirm that it is really industrial or is it 'planned' to become industrial ?

Deyuan (relation/9637961 ) isn't a closed area anymore - can you fix it?

sağol ;)

If this "longmen_radii" relation is not needed anymore I'd suggest to delete it together with its members ;)

Don't you think mountain_range is more correct for 龙泉山脉 ? The area is not all wood or forest so should IMHO not be rendered all over in green...

hm - that's still not reflected under https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/石寨镇_(泸州市) ... can you edit zhwiki? ;)

https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/渠坝镇 says:

2019年12月，撤销渠坝镇，将其所属行政区域划归天仙镇管辖。

which google translates to: In December 2019, Quba Town was abolished and its administrative area was placed under the jurisdiction of Tianxian Town.

Feel free to change things if something went wrong...

Do you mean just the coordinates?

From zhwiki it says for 石龙镇 (合江县):

2019年12月，撤销南滩镇，将其所属行政区域划归石龙镇管辖。

and for 大桥镇 (合江县):

2019年12月，撤销佛荫镇，将其所属行政区域划归大桥镇管辖。

But feel free to change it if something went wrong... ;)