Do you mean Bear-in-a-Box? Have you contacted them? Should we escalate?

Wat is nu juist je redenering om van de fietssnelweg hier een unclassified te maken?

Hey Arthur,
I have had to delete that cycleway you drew next to this road way/11290246 , sorry.
We only map cycleways as a separate way (=line) if it is physically separated from the road. Here, it is just a shared lane for counterflow. The main road already has oneway:bicycle=no, which means cyclists can already use it in both directions.
For more info, have a look at osm.wiki/Bicycle . The map showing all the bicycle infrastructure might also be helpful: note/3877092#map=18/50.60766/4.13636&layers=YN

social_facility:for staat daar nu wel wat raar bij. Ik heb niet direct iets op de wiki gevonden over dit soort jeugdgevangeniisen, maar prison=* & prison:for=* wordt heel af en toe gebruikt.

ZNA stuivenberg is reeds gemapped: way/9557447
Dit lijkt me dus nu een punt voor exact hetzelfde.

Mag deze dan op disused gezet worden?

Thanks!
I'll use lifecycle tags and leave a Note

Yeah... reaching a consensus on these things is not easy. But you already know there's several people on Matrix/Element who care about this. And we can ping some more people to respond. Then, if there's sufficient support for a change, we can simply update the wiki. If there's no clear consensus, we might even organize a vote.

Hi Bruno, Thierry,
As discussed on the OSM.be matrix channel, this edit is not in accordance to current mapping practices. Best to change the guidelines first, only then change the map. Since this edit only made changes NOT in accordance to current practices, it was easy to automatically revert it, which I did at
changeset/141195793
Bruno, you're still welcome to create a post at https://community.openstreetmap.org/c/communities/be/61 to discuss changing the current consensus.
I would also recommend sharing personal info here. Both of you are on Matrix, so you can set up a private room there! (or just send a private message here)

Are you sure this way/1085058420 school exists here? I can't find a reference in official data or on the website https://www.arcenciel-saintes.be/

Hi Stef,
Did you survey tracks like this one? way/1098856872
I was there recently and could not find it. Pictures should be on mapillary soon.

Looks good! It could take several days (up to weeks!) for routers to be updated. The previous mapper had accidentally snapped to the forest outline instead of to the road. I've unsnapped the entire junction from the forest outline to make things a little clearer

You disconnected a road here: node/10853077826#map=19/49.87129/4.99874
No biggie, but can be avoided if you watch the validator for almost-junctions.

Het bord zelf staat op mapillary als je wil verifiëren. Geen voertuigen, met uitzondering voor fietsers, brommers en pedelecs. Oh, en er is een nieuw onderbord met uitzondering voor vergunninghouders (volgens mij enkel de vuilkar en de wagens van de stad zelf ofzo)

Hoi Jakka,
Er zijn hier geen fysieke beperkingen geplaatst, er zijn enkel verbodborden gezet.

Dag Jos,
De kwaliteit van deze gebouwen ziet er goed uit. Ik neem aan dat je de adressen later nog doet? En het is een beetje jammer om niet direct building=house te gebruiken. Maar wel een vraag: de geometrie van de gebouwen is werkelijk exact wat er in het GRB zit, en je gebruikt duidelijk de goedgekeurde import flow niet. Hoe ga je precies te werk?

I meant to every individual house! That was not the case yet, but I have added it. I would expect StreetComplete to ask you that question as well...

Thanks for adding housenumbers! Please also add the street name if you can, because without that it's basically impossible to use the data. I added them just now.

J'ai du eliminer way/1093117312#map=19/50.63673/5.75643 , car j'y etait, et ca n'a pas l'aire d'exister. Au moins, il ny a pas de connections avec le Ravel

Hi Artvin, you drew a small new neighborhood here, but there is nothing there. Is this some planned infrastructure you happen to know about?