Hi, you deleted a sidewalk that I added near Hasbrouck that does exist. The imagery isn't completely up to date.
Maybe consider making your changesets smaller so that you can make the comments more descriptive?
Thanks

What was the source for all of these names? I have been to what you have labeled as "Sanborn Lane" and there was not a street sign. And these aren't showing up in TIGER data either

The user who marked them as private has been marking privately owned roads as access=private, though often these roads are legally open to the public. They have ignored my comment and comments by 2 others informing them of this.
This isn't all of the roads this user has marked as private, I will get to the rest of them another day.

Hi, this isn't a proper usage of the access=private tag. Here is the definition of access=private according to the wiki:
"Public access is not allowed. Access is granted with individual permission only. Examples: A driveway with a no trespassing or keep out sign; A company parking lot for employees only."

It appears that someone has already removed access=private from Five Paths Court, and I will remove the tag from
Amey road, so you don't have to worry about this changeset but it would be great if you could go back through your edit history and correct any other times you have misused this tag. Thanks!

I reverted this changeset and your previous one. Renaming a massive trail like this to "Private property" is not the correct approach. I would suggest either adding a fixme tag with more details about where the trail goes through private property or adding a note to the map where the trail goes through private property.

changeset/164230808

here is the link, I meant to include it in that comment: way/1365618149

It looks like you were trying to delete Irwin Place, but in doing so you accidentally made this tiny road connecting State St to the sidewalk. If you were trying to delete Irwin Place, you should delete this too.

Hi, from your changeset comment it sounds like this is privately owned, but you tagged it as having access restricted. Read this to understand the difference between access=private and ownership=private: access=private?uselang=en#Clarification_of_the_term_%E2%80%9Cprivate%E2%80%9D

typo in my changeset comment. Meant to say: "Will manually change the tags so that it won't be labelled as grass."

Update: I ended up redoing the revert because the other changes in this changeset weren't correct. I fixed the parking lot manually.

This didn't revert the changes to the parking lot for some reason so I am reverting this revert.

You shouldn't add personal information to the map because anyone can see it. I have deleted it.

I am going to revert this changeset because it looks like you moved the building outline to trace the roof of the building instead of where the base of the building is. When the imagery looks slanted for tall buildings (like with JQA in this case) tracing the roof doesn't give an accurate location for where the building actually is.

You are correct, and Sylvan was already represented as a residential area:
way/674175738
I left a comment on the changeset that created the node, if it isn't deleted in a few days I will do it myself.

This should also be deleted, because the Sylvan residential area is already on the map.
way/674175738

UHS is already on the map. You should delete the node that you added.
osm.wiki/One_feature,_one_OSM_element

You set building:levels to 12, I'm guessing it was a typo.

I fixed this already btw

Please be careful and review what changes are being made before you upload them, you accidentally made a driveway a couple miles long

I don't think there is any reason to add a node for Frank because it is already on the map. I would recommend deleting the node you added. If you wanted you could add the short name tag to the building and write Frank there too.
way/217243328

The same goes for your other edit adding the Townhouses as a node, because the residential area is already on the map.
node/12647638658