i missed that one. good catch!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165938077

what happened here? i see you already fixed these with real footprints, but i'm curious what this was about
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165004479

watch your changeset comments, this wasn't a minooka edit
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165638963

make sure to change your changeset comment when you're doing different kinds of work
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165006476

you extended roads here, but left the noexit=yes tags on nodes further north. also the new streets you drew crossed without intersecting. disconnected streets can't be routed properly. i already fixed it!
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165400591

make sure your sidewalks stop at the pavement. the portion in the road would be highway=footway + footway=crossing
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165401320

oh, dangit. a little too fast on the trigger finger there, re-used my last changeset comment by accident. should say "fixing some erroneous edits to school areas"

thanks so much for updating these!

thanks for all these detailed edits to crossings! my only suggestion: if a crossing is marked, added a `crossing:markings` tag to make things as thorough as possible. happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/163582277

i know this was a minute ago, but it looks like this name change was a mistake

keep an eye on your changeset comments. this isn't really work associated with the osmus task, it's address / entrance mapping
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162262639

there was already a residential area covering this, keep an eye out for those
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162399148

don't limit your features to the task tile! map the whole thing!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162399742

No worries! Editing where there's tree cover is tough. If you have a decent GPS, you can try to record your path as you walk along the edge of the beach, then use that GPS trace to guide your edit.

Your edit inadvertently tagged the entire pond and wooded area as a beach. I put it back to normal for now, but if you can't see the thing to map it, you can always leave a map note so that others can try to add the feature when imagery gets updated, maybe.

could you please try to keep your changeset areas smaller? your comment suggests you were adding buildings, but you were editing landuse features based on outdated imagery as well. a smaller, more focused changeset would make it easier on others who are reviewing recent edits.

Was this an honest mistake? These features are not beaches.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/162183737

ah shoot, source should say Plainfield Ordinances, not Oswego

when you draw adjacent landuse areas, make sure you snap the nodes together. no reason to draw what are essentially the same nodes twice.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/160919548

natural and landuse features are allowed to overlap. they don't always, but it's acceptable to have residential areas and woods overlap each other.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/161063554