Believe it or not, yes!

When the golf course was established, it was requested that address points be assigned to each hole of the course. The thinking is that if someone calls for emergency services from the course, having some specific information of where *in* the course would be critical in getting responders to the precise location. Kind of a weird use for "unit", but that's how they were assigned.

Now, why they didn't align the unit number with the hole, I have no idea.

hey, stranger! thanks for editing this!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/169114412

good edits! but be sure to update your changeset comment when you do things outside the scope of the maproulette task
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/164582646

sorry for spamming you! osmcha was bugging out.

thanks for fixing those! i thought i was being extra careful with the boundaries i edited, but it looks like i missed a couple.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168032605

thanks for fixing those! i thought i was being extra careful with the boundaries i edited, but it looks like i missed a couple.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168032605

thanks for fixing those! i thought i was being extra careful with the boundaries i edited, but it looks like i missed a couple.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/168032605

hey, don't forget source:addr=Kendall County on these, we want to make it clear that these are authoritative
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167711363

hey there! thanks for adding local info to the map!
just FYI: in OSM, we spell out all parts of a roadway, like "Lane". happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167665856

are we sure these shouldn't be `ref` tags, not names? they feel very ref-y
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167416433

Actually, the trail came from a GPX trace recorded by Village of Minooka Public Works. It does seem that the GPX wasn't properly validated/cleaned before being used, though. But we do have access to high-resolution leaf-off imagery that clearly shows paths in this area. Some look pretty informal, but they're there.

a number of these buildings were already in the map. please be a little more careful so you don't duplicate features that already exist
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166264590

great edits for the most part, but you snapped a couple of fences to the montgomery admin boundary. use the iD editor settings to turn boundary features off to avoid that in the future. keep up the great work!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/167388323

Really late to the game here, but this looks like the I&M canal to me?

i know this was a minute ago, but regarding your not on the grassland next to the fire station: `landuse=meadow` would be a space designated for pasturing animals or growing hay. this is more likely a `natural=grassland`

*is* this a driveway? seems like it's only used to access parking spaces
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165992996

not sure what you did editing this one, but watch out. you converted to adjacent closed ways into weird multipolygons
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/166035941

thanks for cleaning that up! just be careful, you deleted a legitimate address point. already fixed, and not a big deal. thanks again!
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165922611

why add the business details to the area? now the bank and its address are split
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165901835

in some cases, the amenity=school tag is on the area corresponding to the school grounds, and is not needed on the point.

i don't like mapping schools inconsistently like this, but it's good enough for now. maybe eventually we swap the amenity areas for `landuse=education`, but i think this is okay to leave as is.
---
#REVIEWED_BAD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/165911711