jc86035's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 47583616 | Hi, just noting that you seem to have added road surface and lane tags to an MTR metro track. I've removed the tags but you might want to check if you intended to add them to something else. |
|
| 47583292 | Hi, just noting that you seem to have added road surface and lane tags to an MTR metro track. I've removed the tags but you might want to check if you intended to add them to something else. |
|
| 45760620 | Hi, you might want to check for redirects / page moves when doing this. zh:藍田站 was a disambiguation page (turned into a redirect) and the Wikidata item wasn't updated (I merged it) |
|
| 45125548 | 應該連結是 amenity=waste_basket ,對不起
|
|
| 45125548 | 歡迎您到OpenStreetMap。 我想,如果這是一個垃圾桶它應該用“amenity=waste_basket”(維基:https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Dwaste_basket)。而且它不雖要用“https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:ID=1”丶“https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:name=Bin1”(真是有名字嗎?)或“https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:status=FULL”。
|
|
| 45182286 | Welcome to OSM! Are you sure the footpath goes through all the buildings in a straight line? |
|
| 44621996 | …Actually, never mind. |
|
| 44621996 | You may want to use the easier iD editor instead, especially given that you appear to have difficulty using Potlatch. |
|
| 44621996 | The number of the address does not belong in the addr:street field; it belongs in addr:housenumber. |
|
| 44621996 | Please stop deleting things unnecessarily. |
|
| 44621346 | Reverted, this can't plausibly be changed to the location of a single shop. |
|
| 44621017 | I've reverted your edits in this area, because you seem to have messed up the surrounding roads. I haven't added the shop back because it's not clear from the satellite imagery where it's actually supposed to be. |
|
| 44619013 | I've reverted your changeset (changeset/44621364), although I've added the shop back with proper tagging. |
|
| 44619013 | Hi, you seem to have accidentally deleted a hospital and done various other weird things, please don't do that. Also, you shouldn't be labelling shops with highway tags; and you may want to use shop=furniture instead of shop=showroom because the latter isn't a documented value. |
|
| 44609065 | Hi, from the Bing satellite imagery this doesn't appear to actually exist so I've removed it for now. |
|
| 44595441 | Sorry for accidentally undoing this as well. In future, it would help to add the English name, as well as update the landuse around the building (way/449693730). |
|
| 44567367 | No test editing please. |
|
| 44317325 | I might be wrong, but aren't there separate speed limits depending on travel direction for some parts of the line? |
|
| 43938486 | Line colours are added to the route relations, not the tracks. (The MTRC doesn't paint the physical tracks bright red.) |
|
| 43803363 | So I guess the consensus is to tag only the stops as railway=tram_stop and not have railway=halt/station? It seems sensible, if not for the fact that the system is fully bidirectional. |