highflyer74's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 73294094 | Hello! Can you please check these https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Lwm objects? adderss=* is not a valid key. Thank you! |
|
| 73290708 | Moin auch! Hier gab es einen Buchstabendreher bei der PLZ: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Lwj Viele Grüße! |
|
| 73158088 | Moin und danke für Deine Rückmeldung! Bezüglich des Wiki-Artikels muss ich Dir Recht geben. Ich sehe die Dinge meist durch meine "Qualitätssicherungs"-Brille, mit der ich versuche, die Dinge möglichst so zu gestalten, dass sie langfristig auch für den Durchschnitts-Mapper editierbar bleiben. Dieser neigt (gerade bei Nicht-Benutzung von JOSM) zum Übersehen von Tags oder Gesamtzusammenhängen. Schönen Abend Dir! |
|
| 73124936 | Hi and thanks for your feedback! There are three parts of roads that have slipped through. Check out the above Overpass link and they will be shown to you. See you! |
|
| 73158088 | Hello! The tag you added here is not really needed (and includes a typo as well ;-)). Using the osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix is rather meant to be added to the main tag of an object, e.g. if the bridge is not in use anymore it would be disused:highway=footway. Adding a note=* is totally fine, as it can be read by other mappers. See you! |
|
| 73193040 | Reverted here as well, same reason as in changeset/73144902. Please pay attention to your edits and also do not ignore the warnings JOSM gives you. OSM is not a playground but a live database. If you want to try things, please do it locally but do not use the OSM database for it. Thank you! |
|
| 73144902 | Hello and welcome to OSM! Please, before adding data to OSM, make sure to gain some knowledge on how OSM works. Here you added several ways without any valid OSM tag. Also, as this looks like an attempt to import data from from some other database, please observe the strict rules we have established for importing data. More information on that can be found here osm.wiki/Import. This changeset will be reverted for above mentioned reasons. If you need any advice, just let me know! |
|
| 73136768 | Again, here https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Lrn you can see incomplete tags on railway stations (public_tra)=* and non-OSM data on objects. If an object is not used anymore (like some of the train stations) they should be tagged in accordance with osm.wiki/Lifecycle_prefix. This would make the description=* obsolete and is machine readable. If you need any help, just let me know! |
|
| 73148422 | Moin! Nur als Info: der Editor iD hat leider die unschöne Angewohnheit, beim nochmaligen Hinzufügen eines Tags, welches schon vorhanden ist, keine Fehlermeldung zu geben, sondern kommentarlos ein _1, _2, _3 usw an den Key zu hängen. Sichtbar wird dies z.B. hier node/2345397544. Die so verfälschten Keys werden in aller Regel von keiner Software ausgewertet. Deshalb beschränkt man sich auf ein start_date=*. Ich kann Dir sehr den Editor JOSM (https://josm.openstreetmap.de/) ans Herz legen. Dieser macht die Bearbeitung sehr viel komfortabler und sicherer, da er vor potentiellen Fehlern warnt. Ein tolles Tutorial im PDF Format, welches von einem engagierten Mit-Mapper erstellt wurde, findest Du hier: osm.wiki/File:Osm-tutorial.pdf Viele Grüße! |
|
| 73124936 | Hello! Can you please check these https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Lrj roads? There is an invalid tag on each of them. Please pay more attention to the warnings given to you by JOSM before uploading data, as e.g. in this case it throws warnings about a numeric key. That would reduce the workload for the community. Thank you! |
|
| 73152493 | Hello! Can you please check the tagging on the windows of the tower? It seems there is a typo on all four windows (https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Lrf). Did you mean width=* maybe? All the best to you! |
|
| 73100634 | Hello! Just for info: instead of 4x4only=* it seems that 4wd_only=* is the way to tag (4wd_only=*). I fixed way/590802123. All the best! |
|
| 73139391 | Forgot to attach the link: |
|
| 73139391 | Hello! When you add tags to an object, please make sure to use the correct ones. Otherwise the data is of no use to other people. In this case you are using "::" instead of ":" when adding the address. This way the address can not be read by software. Also: which editor software did you use? And: please use proper changeset comments when uploading data, so that you fellow mappers understand what your intention was. If you have any questions, don't hesitate to ask! |
|
| 73138473 | Salam! Can you check this road way/635467083 please. There is a non-OSM tag attached. Maybe you can improve it. In case you need advice, just let me know. All the best to you! |
|
| 73143046 | Moin! Kleiner Tippfehler in den Tags... :-) Wäre es in diesem Fall nicht sogar sinnvoll zu löschen, oder wird dort nochmal Ähnliches installiert? Viele Grüße! |
|
| 73143489 | Changeset reverted due to above reasons. |
|
| 73138245 | Hello! Thank you for your edits. I noticed you introduced some tags that are usually not used in OSM. Please make sure to avoid adding non-OSM data like "CREASRC=OMM-DRD-CDD Paung TS mapping session" or "EDITCOM20190808=TZ" to objects. All information regarding the source of data should be added to the changeset itself (like you did). In case this was an import from some database please observe the rules concerning data imports into OSM, which you can find here: osm.wiki/Import If you need help, just let me know! |
|
| 73169498 | Hello! I noticed you added some information to OSM, which ist good. Please keep in mind that, in order to make data useful to other people, you have to tag objects according the OSM wiki (osm.wiki/Main_Page). Otherwise your entries can not be read by software using the OSM database. As an example here node/6037736148 there are many non-OSM tags attached. All address tags are not valid, and there is also some confusion with opening and collection times. Maybe you can reply here in the changeset and we can fix it together? |
|
| 73144301 | Changeset reverted due to above mentioned reasons. |