Hi UztaxiSamarkand,
can you please educate yourself about the meaning of changeset comments?

osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Kind regards
Guido

Hi UztaxiSamarkand,
your recent changesets have left behind a lot of errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines without any attributes:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=geometry&lon=66.98357&lat=39.62073&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=self_intersection_ways%2Cself_intersection_points%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_node_in_way

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130170475

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

... and the relation of "Баткен району" has been destroyed as well:

relation/4033859

Guido

Hi Chesnyimoder,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Кадамжай району":

relation/4033820/history

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130698589

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi pablohawkes,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relation of "Municipio de Colonia Caroya":

relation/9408617/history

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=66608679

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi lamder,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding not connected ways (red markers):

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=routing&lon=-77.36390&lat=-9.16395&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges%2Cduplicated_edges_areas%2Csnap_points%2Cunconnected_open_ends_1%2Cunconnected_open_ends_2%2Cunconnected_open_ends_3%2Cunconnected_open_ends_4%2Cunconnected_open_ends_5%2Cunconnected_open_ends_6

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130123315

As you may know unconnected ways cannot be used by routing software. Can you please fix this?

I am wondering about what source you used to add those ways as they are not visible on satellite images. Can you please explain?

Kind regards
Guido

Hi Editors,
this changeset has left behind broken boundary relations for "Llano alto" and "Parque del Niño":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-78.77814&lat=-2.89555&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi Editors,
this changeset has left behind broken boundary relations for "Patul" and "Llampasay":

relation/13049383/history

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-78.76985&lat=-2.89167&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=109059296

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

This changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "La Ferroviaria" and "La Argelia" by deleting way/203949572. I have just fixed this errors.
Guido

Hi Leonardo ,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Barrio San José Alto", "Barrio SanBarrio Vaticano Vicente" and "Barrio Vaticano":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-73.02664&lat=5.82917&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130567663

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hallo Karsten,
wie hoch ist denn die Parkgebühr?
Guido

The relation items do not show up because the pedestrian area it is no valid multipolygon:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.30375&lat=48.30251&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

For more information have a look here:

osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Kind regards
Guido

Hi RLakhani,
this changeset has left behind a broken residential area relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=68.39517&lat=25.41817&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi mixba,
this changeset has destroyed several boundary relations.

I have just reverted it to fix those issues.

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130578564

Please watch out what you are doing.
Guido

Hi mixba,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Canning", "Partido de Ezeiza" and "Partido de Esteban Echeverría".

I have just reverted it to fix those issues.
Guido

Hi Christian,
I have reverted this changeset now to make fixing the relations easier.
Guido

Hi Christian,
this changeset has destroyed the boundary relations of "Baru" and "Bulogading":

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130538634

Guido

The relations are fixed now:

changeset/130589708#map=17/-5.13280/119.41379

Guido

Hi Christian,
this changeset has destroyed the tree boundary relations by deleting way/977821994:

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=130518374

I have fixed this now by restoring the lost way. I have also removed the newly painted boundary way you have added in a recent changeset. Please keep the history as far as possible.

Guido

Hi Christian,
sorry but the relations are still broken, look here:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=119.41806&lat=-5.13247&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

You can also see this if you look at the relation links I have provided yesterday above.
Guido