Thanks for your quick response.
Guido

Hi Jk488,
this changeset has left behind a broken postal code (0108) relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=44.78958&lat=41.70033&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/19950847/history#map=15/41.70133/44.78824

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi Anitha,
your and your colleagues changesets have left behind a huge amount of self intersecting buildings:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=31.61624&lat=4.81799&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi Diana,
your and your colleagues changesets have left behind a huge amount of self intersecting buildings:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=31.61624&lat=4.81799&zoom=12&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi Saghoura,
this changeset has left behind a broken residential relation only composed by "inner" areas:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-8.51347&lat=33.22774&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/19456217/history#map=18/33.228150/-8.515506

Can you please fix this?
Guido

Hi TAMTAM17,
these errors still exist. Can I get your feedback here?
Guido

Hi SimonPoole,
this changeset has left behind a damaged boundary relation for "Saint-Blaise":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.99165&lat=47.02502&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/1685530/history#map=14/47.02990/6.98866

Can you please fix this?

May be you could use a editor which shows warnings if you try to upload broken relations, like JOSM?

Kind regards
Guido

The boundary relation of "Vaumarcus" is damaged as well here:

relation/1685539/history#map=15/46.88222/6.75748

Hi SimonPoole,
this changeset has left behind a damaged boundary relation for "Saint-Aubin-Sauges":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=6.85443&lat=46.88779&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/1685529/history#map=14/46.90680/6.75317

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi SimonPoole,
this changeset has left behind a damaged postal code relation for "Feldbach":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=8.80437&lat=47.23766&zoom=13&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/3581318/history#map=14/47.23557/8.78664

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi Giovanni ,
this changeset has damaged the boundary relation of "Matese":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=14.42437&lat=41.39837&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/14434408/history#map=11/41.4263/14.3919

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi ChRogel,
thanks for your feedback, seems to be OK now.
Guido

Thanks for your quick response.
Guido

Hi Lola,
you still seem to assemble relations into collections and adding other errors as well:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=11.97306&lat=44.54879&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/17602382/history#map=17/44.557031/11.953994

Please stop doing this. Keep things smart and maintainable; this will also help you to avoid making errors (I just fixed one of them).
Guido

Hi David,
this changeset has damaged several boundary relations e.g. "Caen-6", "Caen-8" and "Deuxième circonscription du Calvados":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-0.34374&lat=49.17824&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ring_not_closed%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi cantece,
your recent edits have left behind a broken monastery relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=2.79472&lat=44.56200&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi Matthias Ingenieur,
diese Änderung hat die Wiese in einen Kreis mit selbst überschneidenden Rändern verwandelt:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=7.75271&lat=49.42393&zoom=18&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

way/165052270/history#map=19/49.424207/7.753797

Ich habe soeben die Änderung zurückgesetzt, um den Schaden zu beheben.
Guido

Hi Mattia Vitturi,
this changeset has left behind a damaged relation for "Laguna di Venezia":

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=12.31577&lat=45.34891&zoom=11&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/3049430/history#map=11/45.3645/12.3342

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi efash,
this changeset has damaged the grassland relation/12765151:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=5.99407&lat=45.78987&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

relation/12765151/history#map=15/45.79230/6.00117

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179579913

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido

Hi ChRogel,
this changeset has created errors in the OSM database regarding self intersecting lines, so the affected wood area cannot be rendered properly:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=-4.10839&lat=48.01192&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

https://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=179597145

Can you please fix this?
Kind regards
Guido