Hei 3s4d!
Velkommen som bidragsyter til OpenStreetMap!
Ser du har "test-tegnet" en skog midt i Valevatn i Sirdal.
Du fikk det til! :)
Men nå kan du kanskje ta bort testen din igjen, siden det dukker opp på kartet for alle...

vennlig hilsen gormur

Hei Semtex72!
Velkommen som bidragsyter til OpenStreetMap.
Ser du har lagt til en park i Holteveien 1. Sikker på at det ikke er et hus eller hage der?

No. But it isn't an official name either. Added a note.

Kraftverk og rørgate ble duplisert med dette changeset-et.

Most, if not all, of these houses are not closed ways. They have duplicated nodes in one of the corners. Import gone wrong? Or did you draw them by hand?

The peak is named "Gråkallen", and has nothing to do with the tram system in Trondheim...

They look totally fine to me. They do touch eachother in real life too.
And by the way: I only updated the addresses in this changeset. Someone else drew the houses before me.

Can you please link to one example building with a problem?

But why change to a node?
If anything, it could have been expanded to a circular way, roughly the size and shape of the bay. Now there is no information about the size of the bay...

Yeah.
There is no road named Vågavågen, perhaps a path at best, but certainly no named street.
Vågavågen is the name of the bay next to the adresses.
But the adresses are correct. They come from the official (very accurate) norwegian adress register (legal source, imported).
What is wrong here is the highway=water tag that obviously was a hack. If anything, that tag is the one that should be removed. After all, it is just to mute some inspectors that can perfectly well be ignored.
Regarding addr:place: I can see the idea, but I personally don't like it. It just makes it harder to keep the adresses updated and harder for data consumers to use them.

If you want to remove the highway=water, I won't be offended :)

It is being reconstructed. I will eventually get to reuse it, but do whatever you want to with it.

Done.

No, it is not the same as way/5009690. There is not a oneway restriction here, just a priority for those who come from NW.
It might be misuse of the oneway tag for this, so I'd be happy to change to a better alternative, but I have not found one yet.

Noen spesiell grunn til at du slettet Ålgårdsslåtten (way/40585137)? Har undeleted den nå.

No idea. Fixed it now. Just fix it if you find more.

Sure! You don't need to ask me for such small changes.

Go ahead

Det kan hende jeg var litt rask på labben når jeg leste denne (eller en annen gjengivelse av Vegvesenet si pressemelding).
http://www.nordlys.no/steinras-stenger-e6-apner-uferdig-tunnel-for-trafikk/s/5-34-175814

Why did you change Rogfast project from proposed to construction? No construction has been started. The project hasn't even been finally approved.

There are some strange tags on ways in this changeset, please review your edit. Examplres: way/340066493, way/340068419, way/340068418