emersonveenstra's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 132492451 | Are you still working on this? I noticed the sidewalks got a bit messed up here: osm.org/edit?way=486428136#map=19/43.51992/-84.14009 but i didn't want to step on your toes if you're still working on it. |
|
| 132061619 | Are you still working on these routes? I noticed that the stops and roads don't match up here: relation/9750194#map=16/42.9690/-85.6730 but didn't want to step on your toes. |
|
| 132273174 | Happens to everyone occasionally, don't worry about it :) |
|
| 132403739 | Generally if you're reverting someone's work, you make an attempt to contact them first to discuss why you're reverting it. In the future, please do that. That being said, this is still inaccurate because according to the wiki page you linked, there is no such role as 'seat' in an admin boundary. Can you explain what the 'seat' role relation is? |
|
| 132376946 | Hi, Can you please double-check way/1143666039? It looks very small to be a garage |
|
| 132316983 | Correct, you aren't supposed to have a node with natural=wood, that is what natural=tree is for. |
|
| 132316983 | Sure, natural=tree and natural=wood. There's also natural=tree_row which might be applicable in some cases |
|
| 132360387 | Hi, If there's a driveway there, you shouldn't delete it, you should change the tags to highway=service and service=driveway. It's bad practice to remove valid data from OSM, because someone else will just re-add it later and you've created more work for them. Could you please add it back? Thanks! |
|
| 132316983 | Hi, When you're mapping individual trees (like way/1141470876, way/1141470879, and way/1141470878), it is incorrect to make them an area with natural=wood, they need to be a node with natural=tree. Would you mind fixing these please? Thanks! |
|
| 132273174 | Hi, On way/1129823003/ way/1140189700 and way/1129826445 you added left and right values for sidewalk/cycleway, but forgot to remove the main one that was already there, so now they are conflicting. Could you please fix that? Thanks! |
|
| 132279499 | Hi, Looking at way/1140379817, there's no established tag natural=River Tower, was that a typo or did you mean that? |
|
| 132217480 | Thanks! This page explains it in full detail osm.wiki/Bicycle#Cycle_features, but the rule of thumb is if there's no physical separation between the bike lane and the road, then it shouldn't be mapped separately. If there's a verge or barrier between the cycleway and road, then it can be drawn separately. Hope this helps! |
|
| 132221378 | Hi, Roundabouts are not supposed to have names, can you please remove the name of way/1138981061? Thanks! |
|
| 132221704 | Hi, Roundabouts normally do not have names, see junction=roundabout#The_roundabout_itself:~:text=Only%20if%20the%20roundabout%20itself%20has%20a%20name. Can you please remove it? Thanks! |
|
| 132217480 | Hi, You created this cycleway here: way/1138948087 However, the street was already tagged with cycleway=lane, and since the cycleway is part of the road, it can't be a separate object. Could you please remove it? Thanks! |
|
| 132212762 | Hi, highway=unclassified is incorrect, this is not part of the public road network. Could you please change it back to highway=service? Thanks! |
|
| 132170107 | changeset was supposed to be 125275293 |
|
| 132131641 | oops, i meant you added a cycleway:left=lane tag |
|
| 132131641 | Hi, On way/897491922, you added cycleway:left=yes but you left an existing cycleway:both=no tag, so these are now conflicting. Can you please fix this? Thanks! |
|
| 132085393 | Hi, You attached several driveways and sidewalks to nodes that were tagged noexit=yes. This will break routers, could you please remove the noexit tags from these nodes? For example: way/525412630 and way/1137877230#map=19/42.47178/-83.21627 and several others in that area |