Neither of us are the note creator nor have we encouraged anyone to make such notes. We, like yourself, have no responsibility for the poor notes of others. You however have a responsibility to do your due diligence when mapping to resolve notes. Notes creators, almost by definition, do not know what is already mapped, especially for ALPRs as most OSM renderings don't show them.

Folks have noticed that you're mapping duplicate nodes for Flock ALPRs. Please ensure that you are not adding duplicate data to the map when resolving notes. Just mark the note as resolved without mapping anything if it's already mapped.

Meant to have a more descriptive comment but hitting enter twice in josm.. saved.

Names & closures based on https://www.rva.gov/fire-emergency-services/operations

Names all changed to "Fire Station X" and company information moved (and improved in many cases) to an ATYL tag called fire_company bc AFAICT there is no documented means of tagging fire companies.

LOL. typical indeed. Thanks for the info!

Nice! Has the old trail actually been closed? Last time I rode thru, the new trail was done but the old trail was open too.

Got it. Thanks for the feedback!

maybe I'll add an extra "are you sure?" alert before uploading to OSM.

At some point I do want to add support for more tags like cyclofix has.

Hi, creator bikehero here. What do you mean by 'way too quick'? I agree that it _used_ to be way too quick (tap & it's created). But you now have to click "upload" after tapping. What did you expect to happen when you tapped upload?

And it's up and running again! You can now see the original bike repair station at this location: https://bikehero.io/#18/39.98284/-75.15548

Hey fmvaldezg84, I noticed you made a bike repair station node using BikeHero. Thanks for checking it out but it was (and still is) broken :(

I'll fix it up soon and let you know when it's working again!

I've cleaned up the duplicate nodes here, so you've got nothing to worry about.

Hi, could you please not add duplicates of cycling infrastructure. I have no real issue with mapping cycletracks as separate highway=cycleway, but if you do, please remove the cycleway tagging on the road itself.

Thanks!

Hi, what is your source for the footway in Holywood Cemetery that connects to Dobson Street? The cemetery very strictly controls access, and as far as I know there isn't a pedestrian entrance to the cemetery next to Clark Springs Elementary.

Note that what you see in imagery are not tracks. those are fences.

but it (a highway=track) does not exist. There is not track. There is a groomed ski trail at times and a ski slope at times, but there is never a track. (the pre-existing highway=path in the area _do_ exists, there are paths through the forest. But the snowfarm is just an open grassy field in the summer.

Hi. I'm not sure tagging the snowfarm trails & weiss slope as tracks is appropriate. It feels like "tagging for the renderer" osm.wiki/Tagging_for_the_renderer

These rendered exactly as they should have without these changes in ski-centric map renderers such as openskimap and opensnowmap.