way/874598517/history

вы сами буквально поменяли зоны там рядом с парков на песок)))

> А причем тут спутник?
прочитайте свой же комментарий к этому ченджсету

> Вы ногами найдите их.
кого их?

> песка заваленного природа там нет
я не понимаю что это значит

> именно это означает natural=sand
natural=sand значит значит "Область покрытая рыхлым песком с незначительным количеством растительности или вообще без неё", тут нечего додумывать, песок есть песок, из него вся эта насыпная территория

к тому же как же это "исправление" когда вы кучу зон просто удалили и только одну поправили
https://osmcha.org/changesets/168313690

в общем не сносите в будущем так без обсуждения - иначе будет шанс еще один блок в ваше обширную коллекцию получить :D

не понял, а зачем вы удалили песочные зоны которые тут совершенно точно есть на самом последнем спутнике (Esri апр 25)? вы просто детализацию удаляете потому что так захотелось или как?)

верну некоторые на место...

I see, but numbering isn't a problem here, I'm talking about those lines starting/ending completely outside of the golf field, this doesn't change with time... :)

hi! are you completely sure you've mapped it correctly, taking into account, this object way/1119181250/history#map=19/34.983886/33.723784 is where it is, for example?

can you clarify the source of this village? I see no info online about any "Minden" being there

добрый день, у вас все комменты это "дороги" или "пои", можете плиз по существу подробней писать что именно меняете, "дороги" ничего не говорят
osm.wiki/RU:Good_changeset_comments

hi, well just like this one changeset/172375905 which I wrote to you about - you again made an incorrect change, why do you ignore the warnings the editor shows to you? You have 6 warnings in this changeset, don't commit changes with warnings okay?

while here way/1454136446 you do it correctly, puzzling... anyways will fix those which will see

see here - https://imgur.com/a/4P28k0i

to the left is how you map them, to the right - is how they must be actually mapped

hi, I see you just added those buildings like that - way/1454132948, thanks! but....

if you want, you can draw them by the roof shape but please (!) position on the ground where building actually stands, because the way you map them - they are in incorrect position as the building doesn't stand where it's roof is shown on satellite, you get what I mean?

as you are not answering and didn't fix that partial roof-only mapping - I will delete all those objects you've added and remap it correctly

ответите? я вижу что на сайте активны)

btw as I've mentioned in another comment here changeset/172004505 - aren't those parking positions mapped incorrectly, as they should have a direction instead of mimicking the area, per wiki description?

and the main question - I'm not familiar with this tag rules, but the way it mapped is weird taking into account the description in wiki (aeroway=parking_position) "Draw a way from the relevant taxiway and to the nose wheel position. The direction of the way indicates the direction a plane should park. This usually means that the last node of the way should be where the nose wheel is parked. Tag the way."

But you've drawn rectangles there instead of a way, why? doesn't it mean you marked those parking places incorrectly here?

hi, just to ask - are those parking areas skewed by design or not? corners are not squared, I mean

hi, well it's this again - so many incorrect buildings here which are just copy pasted and too big, I just reverted this changeset/175814629

will add properly sized objects here

bro that's such a lazy and incorrect mapping I just cant ahah

way/842102005/history

will delete and remap

hi, there were no int_name there, so added en, but thx for the info, will know!

but a question then - where is this convention defined? I open "name" page in wiki in Greek (osm.wiki/El:Key:name) and even there it's written "Consider using language specific names instead; e.g., osm.wiki/Tag:name:en=...." in int_name description, so basically it's saying the exact opposite of the convention you just mentioned, so what is it? :)