Hi Santiago,
Thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap in Switzerland. I noticed you gave spanish names (name:es) to viewpoints without a local name. Additionally, it seems these spanish names are actually descriptions of what is visible.If the later is true, please move to description:es tag.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Pascal,
Welcome to OpenStreetMap. I think I noticed a slight mistake since I don't expect a Chalet is in the middle of the road. Could you please check and correct?
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Source is incorrect, I was not there in 2017...

Hi Danilo,
I just noticed by coincidence, you added a second Case Cana, the other is 400m northwest and has been there for 8 months longer. I guess one of both has to be a mistaken name.

node/5113086243
I updated that one after a visit, but I did not come up with the name.

Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Thank you for the offer, I was already there and it was great!

Hi Daniele,
Thanks for getting back. I was checking for hiking plans for my holiday I bumped into this mistake by coincidence.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi geevee,
7 months ago I was able to cycle there. I am sorry for your struggles this time.
You say that the path is barely visible, with which you say it is still there but just not really feasible by bike. I already gave it a trail_visibility=intermediate tag for the first reason. Since the path is still sort of visible, people do use it apparently. Since at OSM we map what's on the ground I would be inclined to leave the path on the map. But it may be good to attach an mtb:scale for the difficulty of the path so the routing engine can use that info to not send you there by bike, but only by foot.
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hallo Christoph,
Ich bin mir nicht gewohnt in iD, habe es doch nachgeschaut. Wenn du die rechter Maustaste drückst gibt es ein Contextmenu und kannst du die Wegen separieren.
Ich sehe, das ein teil diene Eintragen (schon wieder gelöscht sind, ich glaube weil sie keine Markierungen hatten. changeset/60056551
Ich habe dort gefragt die zurückzusetzen.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hallo asdf2,
Mit dieser Changeset hast du Wege gelöscht die im Changeset womit sie eingetragen würden diskutiert werden.
changeset/59897003
Löschen gehört nicht zu 'fix tagging', würde ich sagen. Du hast Recht dass es Fehler gibt, aber löschen ist dann nicht die Lösung, sicher wenn ein neuer OSM Nutzer ein Review gefragt hat für den Changeset. Diskussion soll immer der Anfang sein.
Kannst du die wegen bitte zurücksetzen, sodass diese mit die richtige Markieren versorgt werden?
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hallo melay,
Du hast eine Review gefragt. Ich hab es mir angeschaut, die Änderung seht gut aus!
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hi caminotravelcenter,
You requested a review. I think you did a good job in aligning the track to the imagery.
At the new location there was already another track though, because the junction was at the incorrect position. I've corrected this in the following changeset:
changeset/60220052
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hallo Rope18,
Danke für die Antwort, ich hätte schon die Idee das es veilleicht ein Copy-Paste Fehler war.
Du hast jetzt die Markierung vom Knot entfernt. Weil ein Knot ohne Markierung und ohne Verbindungen nichts ist kann der Knot selber auch entfernt werden.
Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel

Hi Dmitrii,
I noticed you have created a guest_house here. Do you by any chance have further details on the guest house like name, phone number and website? This would greatly improve the usefulness for other people to make use of your contributions.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi blubberblub
I now notice you are not Simon, my bad :-S. I think I need sleep...
Anyway, I sent the comment because you asked for a review. It's a good job you did, updating the directions!
Is all clear?
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi BiGDoMe,
I see you could handle my earlier comments. You did a good job here! It is always good practice to not connect too many nodes from different entities.
Keep up the happy mapping!
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Simon,
On-way not for bike I like :-). For those stretches of the road where there is a cycle lane in the opposite direction you could add
cycleway=opposite_lane or cycleway=opposite
Check the wiki for the difference:
cycleway=*
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Same comment as here:
changeset/60178759

Hi caminotravelcenter,
You asked for a review. I notice you added foot=yes to this way. Also in other recent changeset you add this tag. In my opinion it is not required to add this tag a highway=service;track;residential implicitly allow pedestrians. It does no harm either, but you could save the effort or use it somewhere else :-).
Have a look here for implicit access:
osm.wiki/OSM_tags_for_routing/Access-Restrictions#Switzerland
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hi Simon,
This looks good! It's great to see you moved onward to iD :-).
Cheers,
dikkeknodel

Hallo highbuilder,
Ich meine folgenden Widerspruch ist gewiss aus Versehen:
name:de=RRRevolve
name=Little Black Dress

Das sehe ich öfter bei den MAPS.me Nutzer.

Liebe Grüsse,
dikkeknodel