Hi, I noticed you have remove the tag from the park relation object which declares the kind of relation (type=multipolygon). Was this on purpose?

Best regards,
Martin

ja, so handhabe ich das auch. Evtl. ist mir das amenity=hospital am Geländer hier entgangen (weil OverpassAPI nicht funktioniert gerade)?

Hi DK,
habe gesehen dass Du amenity=hospital von der Nervenklinik entfernt hast, ich würde das dranlassen (auf dem Gesamtgelände der Klinik). Es gibt zwar auch Kliniken Tal, aber das bedeutet nicht dass die Nervenklinik nicht auch ein Krankenhaus (oder evtl eine Klinik) ist.

Hi Mannivu, thank you for replying so fast, I just wanted to make you aware there is currently some discussion about iD sometimes not reflecting community consensus, often deliberately, here is a page in the wiki recently set up osm.wiki/ID/Controversial_Decisions

There are also many discussions in the iD github repo, but they get usually closed without impact.
I would stick to “zebra” for the moment, there is no general consensus that the tag is deprecated, at this time.

Sorry for picking this up, it wasn’t a systematic approach to find this issue, just by accident and I wondered why a mapper using JOSM would do this change ;-)

Cheers
Martin

Hello, I have noticed you have added an undocumented tag (crossing=marked). Is there a reason you were not using one of the established tags like crossing=uncontrolled, crossing=zebra etc.?

Hi, I have noticed you were using very unusual tagging on this gate. Please use access tags to tag the accessibility and do not abuse names for it. The name tag is only for names. You have also added a tourist information point on this gate. This is very unusual, and my guess is you did not intend to use this tag. If you are interested in the meaning of tags, the best available documentation is the OSM wiki at osm.wiki
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70690458

Hi,
welcome to OSM. Please do not spam the tags, we are collecting geographic information, the description you provided was way to marketing speechy. I noticed your edit because you deleted the building where you business is in. I have now restored it, please be careful.

Cheers,
Martin

Hi Wulfmorn, I have noticed your edit because it looked like an unannounced mass edit ;-)
From what I have seen, there weren't any real problems, but I wonder if we really want to replicate all tags with an additional seamark tag, e.g. historic=wreck as seamark:type=wreck, for example node/5315203957
It doesn't look as if we add information with this kind of duplication? Maybe the seamark community could decide to use the seamark tags only for seamarks (deutsch "Seezeichen") and use the same tags as the other mappers for the same things, rather than duplicating them?
I know there is a long history of doing it, but if we do not stop it at some point, we will have to maintain duplicate tags for eternity, without any apparent benefit?
Cheers,
Martin

Per esempio gli acquedotti non sono pratticamente mai historic=monument in OSM. Il tag significa una struttura commemorativa e accessibile all'interno. Invece il tag per gli acquedotti in OSM è historic=aqueduct e non va bene su un nodo (punto).

Hi Cristian and thank you for contributing to OpenStreetMap via Maps.me. Unfortunately the maps.me editor is not very mature, hence you added the ruins of the aqueduct as a wrong category (a place where you can go into). If you are interested in OpenStreetMap I suggest you use a different editor software. Most map changes are added with JOSM, most users (but with smaller sizes) uses iD editor. Learn more at osm.org if you like.
Cheers,
Martin

Hi GRAB, I have noticed this changeset and wonder what you have been doing. Do you know all these places? Or what did you base your edits on?
In particular I would be interested in knowing what you have been doing here:
node/6269285985
Thank you,
Martin

Hi, I’ve noticed you added ruins of an aqueduct in Testaccio. Are you sure? Because I believe these are remnants of the storage of an antique river port, but I am not completely sure.
By the way, there is also historic=aqueduct for historic aqueducts and their fragments

Dalla mia analisi sembra che non hai trascinato un nodo, ma hai uniti 3 punti (1 di via Murri, 1 di Via Poggioli e un terzo più lontano). Non ti preoccupare dell'errore, è già sistemato, ma cerco di capire com'è successo.

Ciao Senzapaura,
ho visto che si è introdotto un errore con questa modifica, probabilmente per sbaglio hai trascinato un nodo di una strada molto lontano. Puoi vedere la tua modifica qui: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70758661
Cerco di ripristinare la situazione senza perdere gli oggetti che hai aggiunto.
Buona mappatura,
Martin
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/70758661

keine Ursache :)

I can understand you're astonished about the publicity, it is because you have been featured on the talk mailing list ;-)
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2019-May/082575.html

Thank you for replying. To be fair, I have seen some gorgeous "outdated tags" improvements in iD recently (referring to wikidata integration when you add a chain name to a shop in the name tag you will get suggestions to auto-add brand and wikidata tags for this brand, really cool), but there are controversies (currently discussed on talk and tagging mail list) with the crossing tags and eventually more, so turning them completely off may get you rid of some cool stuff as well, just be careful and when in doubt, reluctant ;-)

Have fun mapping!
Cheers,
Martin

Hi, I have noticed you have changed quite some crossing=zebra to an undocumented tag (crossing=marked). Can you give me a hint what is the idea behind this?
Thank you,
Martin

Hi Arcilollo, welcome to OSM. I have been looking at your recent edit and have noticed you are changing the small connections roads from unclassified or residential to "service", for example here: way/118569833
You should not do this, it interrupts the road continuity, while in reality this is simply a crossing of a normal street, even with 2 lanes. Service roads rarely have 2 lanes, they are often on private ground and are never roads that are part of the road grid.
I have noticed you are using the StreetComplete App, maybe there is a translation problem in the app?

Hi Road-Runner,
you lost the name:
node/6498943085/history
(Todis)