se parliamo dell’Italia, town sono le città (che non sono city), e village i capoluoghi di comune che non sono città. Facile, utile, con risultati aspettati e congrui (tiene conto della situazione culturale, storica).
Population è il tag per la popolazione.
+1 al revert

Hi Michele, I just saw you added English translations as names, e.g. Pizzeria due Fratelli got a name "The Two Brothers". Please do not do this. name:en is not a translation, it is for English names. At least in case of the pizzeria there is no English name

Ciao Cesare, ho solo ora notato che hai inserito questo doppione del CTO (era già mappato come area), ma non sono sicuro se lì c'è un secondo ingresso al pronto soccorso. L'ingresso che conosco è dall'altra parte e si accede tramite una rampa (da Via San Nemesio). Mi puoi confermare se la posizione è esatta o approssimativa? Grazie.

This should probably be reverted. Undiscussed mass edit, this changed a lot of toponyms (place nodes and their values) that the community collected and replaced the names with synthetic administrative "names" and admin boundaries.

grazie Alecs, mi ci metto ;-)

Hi gionax,
I just noticed you classified part of the Fontana di Trevi (the "Oceano" sculpture, as "mural" which is typically a painting on a wall. Can you explain, was it on purpose?
way/474063516

@Nakaner : m.E. ist das stilistisch und inhaltlich nicht akzeptabel, was Du da schreibst, Details siehe unter o.g. link im Forum.

Als Bezug, dieses Changeset ist aktuell im Forum genannt worden und es wird zum Thema diskutiert:
https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=735067

der operator tag sollte wieder hergestellt werden, oder war die Angabe falsch?

Are there any news on the pedestrian topic in Venice in general and on this edit in particular?
There's still way/488627565

Hallo RoterEmil, ich habe gesehen dass Du die Bellevueallee von footway mit bicycle=yes zu path mit bicycle=yes geändert hast. M.E. könnte man die großen Wege, die im Prinzip für den Verkehr gesperrte Straßen sind, auch alsl highway=pedestrian mappen, was denkst Du?
way/35383224/

da steht übrigens nicht, dass sie sich als "Wohnheim" sähen, sondern sie nennen es durchgängig "Corpshaus" und schreiben, es sei als Wohnheim anerkannt.
https://saxo-montania.de/haus.php

@geri-oc vielleicht muss man das auch im Einzelfall differenzieren, vielleicht passt es ja auch generell. Ich habe eine vage Vorstellung von Verbindungen und war da auch schon mal als Besucher, aber nur selten.

Bei Studentenverbindungen halte ich es auch für üblich, dass die Gebäude einen Namen tragen. Ob "Wohnheim" für ein deutsches Verbindungshaus passt, könnte man mal auf der Liste oder im Forum diskutieren.

@woodpeck Do I understand you correctly that you deleted a sea area polygon because other sea areas nearby haven't been mapped (yet?) as polygons?
I agree that the boundary line is likely not precisely defined (in reality), but discussing this with the creator before deleting it completely would maybe have been more sustainable. You write that nodes are "sufficient", but how can you understand the size/extent of the area from the node?
How can you see that "The gulf consists of smaller named water bodies, namely the "Bothnian Bay" in the North, and the "Bothnian Sea" in the South. ...and these themselves partly consist of smaller named water bodies like Luodonselkä in the North-East." if these are all "perfectly sufficient" nodes?

Stichworte bezieht sich auf die Form, die Kritik an "erstellt, geändert, aktualisiert" ist, dass es so generisch ist, dass man es an jedes Changeset machen könnte, das beschreibt jeglichen Edit.

ja, am interessantesten ist, warum man etwas gemacht hat, weil was man getan hat sieht man zumindest bei kleinen CS auch so. Man braucht auch keine Romane schreiben, Stichworte sind ok

Hallo unknow74,

bitte nutze aussagekraeftigere Changeset Kommentare. Siehe hierzu auch im Wiki unter: osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

Hi,
I have seen you have changed the tagging for the temple sites on Largo Argentina from archaeological site to ruins. I believe this is not fortunate, because "ruins" is less specific than archaeological site (ruins can be any kind of ruins, an archaeological site is considered more significant, e.g. by the osm carto rendering style sheet, and more details about further tagging are documented. I am aware this has already happened a long time ago, should you not be involved in OSM any more, you can ignore my message ;-)

you have added some geometry tags that seem highly improbable, e.g. the 4 river fountain was added as being 40cm high and 25cm wide, which is obviously complete nonsense.
relation/5150437/history