I did not say to remove anything, and I did not remove the drink:wine tag which mbeyerle has added to this place without knowing it, despite believing it has generally a problem as it isn’t clear whether it is only for places serving a specific drink or also for sale only. I agree that _replacing_ a tag with something more specific has to be weighted against how established/agreed the replacement is. The case at hand is different, because a more specific tag was removed and a more generic/unclear different one added, without any need (different key) and remotely on several places which the editor probably did not know either.

As we seem to agree that the tag removal was misguided, I reverted this part of this edit. Looking at your profile, I noticed you performed several of these edits which all removed sells:wine so we would have information loss in all these cases. Please discuss semiautomatic edits like this beforehand and please bring all these sells:wine that you have removed, back on the map. Currently there are zero sells:wine in the database.

Cheers
Martin

you are correct that the page states the tag drink is used for beverages served or sold (it is written differently in different places), but still it is not a reason to remove the sells:wine tag because it is more specific and doesn’t include drinks served, it is only about selling them

If a tag is not in the wiki it doesn’t imply it should be removed. There is no either or for tags unless they are using the same key. In this case it seems a bakery sells wine, so sells:wine seems a perfect fit. drink:* is about a tag where you can specify which drinks a place serves (to consume on the premises), so it doesn’t apply to this bakery.

drink:wine according to the page you linked is “to describe the specific drink which is served”, so it is not correct with “bottled” either, that would be the case that you would be served bottled wine.

Please, you should never change tags for objects you don’t know in person, and generally there is no reason to remove a tag like sells:wine if you want to add one with a different key like drink:wine (if it would be correct, which happens to not be the case here but could well exist somewhere else).

Cheers
Martin

Thing is, the part in question is not part of any relation, site or other, so now the only way to determine that this is a part of the Aurelian Walls is the name. Please add the wikipedia tag and wikidata tag back, because it is required and it is not wrong. There is no benefit from removing correct information here.

Hi, you removed the reference to wikipedia for this piece of citywalls, there is now no reference at all for this part. Please revert your changes

fatto. Ci sono altri simili da fare revert?

se mi dici i numeri di changeset posso revertare alcuni, tipo questo qui, ok?

ci sono possibilità vari, per ricreare un oggetto singolo c'è una funzione in Josm, per revertare tutto un changeset un'altra. Altrimenti ci sono script...

per dire, "troppo piccolo" non esiste, qualsiasi dimensione va bene.

roof non root, scusa

in OSM sia garage che tettoie le mappiamo. building=yes va bene come tag, ma building=root e building=garage sarebbe più preciso. Toglierle non è giusto, ti chiedo di ripristinare, grazie.

stai dicendo che sono stato rimossi?

Hi, just wanted to let you know you have (maybe inadvertedly) uploaded a low resolution version of the lake above the existent lake data ;-)
I have removed the problem for you.
Have a good day,
Martin

non capisco le tue modifiche, perché togli gli edifici che prima hai inserito?

anche qui vedo soprattutto cancellazioni, di oggetti che non solo erano inseriti da te, ci puoi spiegare le motivazioni?

Ciao Martin

ciao Giorgio,

hai rimosso un sacco di edifici, come mai?

un saluto,
Martin

I don‘t know, maybe there was? Do you know the place?