thank you for looking into this, and excuse me for the wrong accusation!

si, purtroppo non conosco la situazione, altrimenti potrei inserire le aule alla loro posizione.

Hi Dinamik,

you have added some geometry tags that seem highly improbably, e.g. the 4 river fountain was added as being 40cm high and 25cm wide, which is obviously complete nonsense.
relation/5150437/history

Può sembrare utile mettere i nomi/ref delle aule come nome del edificio, ma non è semanticamente corretto. L'edificio non si chiama "Aule N19,N20,N21,N22 e N23", questo è al massimo una descrizione (tag: "description:it" ), ma l'approccio più sensato sarebbe mappare le singole aule, come nodi o con il loro contorno, all'interno dell'edificio, con il tag "level" che indica il piano sul quale si trova e con name ecc. della singola Aula al singolo oggetto che la rappresenti.

welcome! I have noticed you just started to
contribute. Let me know if you need help.

Ciao e benvenuto! Ho appena visto che sei un nuovo mappatore. Fammi sapere se hai bisogno di aiuto.
Un saluto, Martin

Hi, I have noticed you created a park that was already there here: relation/2063040
I have deleted the duplicate.

sind übrigens sehr viele Änderungen in einem Changeset hier, wenn man das ein wenig aufteilen würde, könnte man die einzelnen Dinge besser nachvollziehen und ggf. diskutieren.

Du hast dem Killesbergturm ein Mansarddach verpasst in Höhe des gesamten Aussichtsturm, aber der Turm hat gar kein Dach.
way/306362151

Eigentlich ist das auch kein "building", weil es keine geschlossenen oder überdeckten Räume gibt.

thank you

Yes, for this particular changeset it is too late for a revert, what is unfortunate because of the many deleted objects.

I am returning to this undiscussed import, because I just noticed how many objects have been unduely appropriated by deleting and recreating them, e.g. the Pyramid of Caius Cestius, highways with many nodes and high version count. More than 200 ways have been deleted.

I also use this occassion to renew my interest in learning about the sources for this import.

thank you for removing these tags. Of course they should not have been uploaded in the first place. I also agree you would not have had to discuss this as it is a revert of an undiscussed mechanical edit, but it would have been nice to send a short announcement anyway to talk-it. Again, thanks for dealing with this.

Danke, aber der Edit bezieht sich nur auf allgemeines Wissen, er bezieht sich nicht auf einen aktuellen survey ;-)

the changeset converted indiscriminately footways to pedestrian, apparently all existing footways in a bigger area, while they do not correspond to the pedestrian definition (too narrow, one I surveyed myself is actually just 50cm wide between 2 buildings)
way/488627565

the Amundsen–Scott Station is off by almost 5 degrees of latitude.

this should be deleted, it is a duplicate and has a questionable use of the name tag and poor tagging in general

if you are local in Rome, we are meeting every last monday at 20:00 in Garbatella (currently).

I just saw you also removed leisure=park, the park tag. Sorry, just noticed you are a new user. If you need help, I can recommend the osm wiki (wiki.osm.org) and the italian osm mailing list. There is also a telegram channel.

as I just asked your brother, Legitfly, please be careful when modifying the existing data. You have added a natural=wood tag to the park, but the wood and the park are 2 distinct objects in this case, and the wood is already mapped in a different object.

You have connected the park to the road centerline, please do not extend the parks beyond their actual extent.