Hi there, these roads are not private access, as the public can drive along these roads at any hours of the day without restriction.

Why do you follow the right edge of the lane instead of the actual centerline? There are also weird kinks in the entrance/exit ramps to/from the service road. Also, you are being particularly passive-aggressive with these changeset comments, despite not putting your own comment on the original changeset that made these geometry changes.

Hey there! I'd like to ask why you counted lanes that weren't fully formed (you counted lanes from when they start emerging from the curb, not from when they're done emerging), which conflicts with this section in the wiki: osm.wiki/Lanes#Street

Hey there, thanks for your change! There's no need to split these streets unless something changes with their tags, like road surface or lane count. Also, landuses should generally not share nodes with roads, since they make it hard to change the landuses separate from the road way.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177487460

boundary=census must be closed, why is this tag only applied to this part of the full Tucson boundary?

Hello, I believe CROF in the building name needs to be expanded to its full title, as abbreviations are usually not allowed in names. DART is fine as that is one of its official names

Hi there, and thanks for your change! The operator tag additions are nice, but I don’t think the name of a track should be named after the service that runs on it - that’s what the route relations are for. The tracks are physically for light rail vehicles, and technically any DART LRV can traverse the tracks without being on the red/blue line, so the name field should be reverted to DART Light Rail.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/177100622