I fixed this.

Definitely appreciate adding the parks! The tagging schema is kind of lacking for that sort of partially developed public spaces like this. Happy mapping!

Please be more careful drawing building outlines, and press "q" to square corners of objects you draw in iD.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146842839

This doesn't match the opening_hours syntax. You can use https://projets.pavie.info/yohours/ to create opening_hours values easily!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146824081

leisure=park has a pretty narrow definition, which differs from what we call "parks" in the US. It implies manicured public space. Many "parks" in the US are better tagged as nature reserves on OSM.
From the wiki page on leisure=park:
"This tag is intended for (usually urban) parks with managed greenery, located within settlements and nearly always open to general public [...] They are largely a human-sculpted landscape."
leisure=park

For the sidewalks, you should mark the portion of the way that is crossing the street as highway=footway + footway=crossing. See the wiki for some helpful diagrams: footway=crossing . iD editor will have a tagging preset for this as well, but I don't remember what it's called. Let me know if you have any questions !
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146763922

When elements can be mapped as a node or an area (like parks) you should only have one. I combined the old node onto your new park boundary in this changeset: changeset/146767636
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764599

If it's a preserve, consider changing it to a leisure=nature_reserve. See the wiki: leisure=nature_reserve
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764485

Welcome to OSM, thanks for your contribution
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146764557

I resolved the issues in this changeset:
changeset/146762684

Hi, you dragged around some nodes with this edit. Please be careful and review your changes before you upload!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146759403

Is w/1243338027 really a park?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146729835

Thank you for the fix!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146725288

Hi Darrell, welcome to OSM, and thank you for your contributions. highway=living_street means something very specific on OSM, you can read about it on the wiki: highway=living%20street . You probably should use highway=residential instead. Also, please use the expanded form of the street name.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146719887

Please dont add roads that don't exist to OSM
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146697910

On OSM we map what's on the ground, railway=abandoned is specifically for sections where there is evidence of it existing today. If you want to map historical routes, I recommend checking out OpenHistoricalMap
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146696982

Makes sense, thanks. It's quite hard to tell from aerial/hillshade imagery the condition of the trail, so your on-the-ground experience is valuable!

Looks good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146660358

Welcome to OSM, and thanks for your contributions. A lot of road data in the US has been untouched since it was imported from TIGER in 2007/2008. You will often find roads that were planned but never actually existed, or unmaintained/abandoned roads. In these cases it looks like the roads exist in some form but are probably not navigable by cars. Please take a look at the wiki page for abandoned roads: abandoned:highway=* . Let me know if you have any questions, and happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146660159

Is "Provence HOA" a park, or an HOA office?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/146679274