Hi Anthony, did they remove the bridge? It looks like it's still there in the 2024-03-07 Esri imagery.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158111776

Phillips 66 was already mapped - you also added a giant building covering the parking lot.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158179864

Why are there place=city_block in the middle of the interchange?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/158080367

I have reverted this edit because you have added your name for an office that contains many different realtors.

changeset/158077628

Also, amenity=university is used to mark the entire university, not a single building - I have changed "The Union" to building=university instead. Let me know if you have any questions
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157983949

Welcome to OSM! It looks like you accidentally created a route relation - I have removed that for you. The coffee shop and restaurant both look good!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157983949

foot=no should only be added to roads where it is not legal to walk along them

changeset/157941773

Please do not put the address number in the name=* tag

What router are you using? Can you provide an example route which fails to route on the sidewalks?

In the US, we use the 2 letter abbreviation for addr:state
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157462563

Also, there is already a place node for Reagan - node/151866612

Reagan is unincorporated, so it probably doesn't make too much sense to define it with a boundary. Also, the population you linked is for Reagan County, Texas - the population of Reagan is definitely much lower than that.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157461994

oops - I meant to write "model earthen dam and reservoir"

Hi wallyjandro, on OSM foot=use_sidepath simply means that pedestrians are required to use the adjacent pedestrian path or sidewalk - the name is a result of OSM being an international project. In Texas, pedestrians are required to use an adjacent sidewalk if it exists, so it might be a bit redundant to mark this on every single road with a sidewalk, but it isn't strictly incorrect.

Thanks for your contribution! The address number should not go in name - only addr:housenumber. I will go ahead and fix that for you. Happy mapping!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157773669

Hi Giovanni, and welcome to OSM. Please try to draw the sidewalk a bit more carefully - it crosses into the road and across fences a few times! Also, consider using footway=crossing for the spots where the sidewalk crosses the street ( see osm.wiki/Sidewalks#Sidewalk_as_separate_way )

Happy to answer any questions you may have!
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157645522

capacity is for the maximum number of cars which can be charged at a station, is it not?
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/156520833

You should use a multipolygon for the parking lot in this case.

service=parking_aisle is specifically for roads that pass between parking spaces in parking lots - I think this is probably fine to keep as highway=service alone, maybe service=driveway if you think that is a better fit.
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/157441847

I want to clarify that I did not update OSM - I just checked the result to see if your edit worked. Just so I better understand the issue - your address is in unincorporated Kent County, but your postal address is in Scurry county? I recommend you post a question about this on the OSM community forum ( https://community.openstreetmap.org/ ), because more people will see it there.