To me it seems your cherry-picking my old/vague changesets to make a problem that doesn't exist when you ignore the many more where I do add things. also what's wrong with removing if its no longer there?

yea its called removing things that no longer exist on imagery and are being redeveloped????

I dont know what imagery you are using but maxar and esri clearly show this nursery no longer exists.

well apparently this project is finished I was just waiting for someone better to detail it.

why not? to me it seems like this bridge was recently replaced.
---
#REVIEWED_GOOD #OSMCHA
Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/106614446

what are these new buildings I removed and you seriously do not need to copy paste and spam me 7 times.

it was a really bad import of Georgia state landuse data roughly a decade ago, mostly the Atlanta area.

yes I did

yes I did, thats weird because I clearly remember only removing two buildings.

the only ones I deleted were school buildings the are being replaced.

I did not delete the whole building I only deleted the satellite buildings that have been demolished.

also no need for so many comments at one time

what rail is left except on the bridge to the south?

the Popeyes is new? how can that be when its shape and driveways are on the older imagery?

Yes it would

because there isn't one singular building taking up the entire property and thats how it was rendering.

uhhhhhhh can I get a explanation for the name

they weren't outdated, they used to exist and now they dont.

old bridges that have been replaced on the tpike and land cover thats not true anymore
---

Published using OSMCha: https://osmcha.org/changesets/99715234

is there not grass around the southern building?