closure for replacements of things other than the bridge DO NOT NEED TO BE TAGGED AS CONSTRUCTION.

it should be complete

Simple, since it was near a construction area i thought that it was some map newb who did it.

which way would you be talking about? and no

if i had to investigate the history of every way i touched when editing i would never get anything done and my pc would fry with all those tabs, besides when i delete something i only remove when i see no trace left on any imagery.

Besides, why tf is half of a road one way and the other not? How can you even drive on that?

Imgery obviously, and how the hell was i supposed to know someone had surveyed this?

I honestly did not see those tags, sorry. PS, WS beltway kernersville rd interchange needs some updating too, last i checked it was a ddi not a spui.

ok thanks for the info.

Are you sure we should consider construction contract awardments as the beginning of construction?

yes i am, plus any video renderings.

The only thing i used were the maps themselves, the project plans and what i could reasonably infer. As you can see im not a newb, i think i would know proper map ettiqute by now and not go on a deleting spree. Besides most of the things i edited should have edited long ago and for such a big city youd think atleast one person in it would be on osm. Plus i periodically check calgary and it barely changes from what i see.

Ok then, thanks for the info.

If I made a mistake i apologize, now get off your horse.

I can assure you that I ruthlessly compare imagery and the only things I removed were trees that appear to be gone.

huh, I never noticed that it did that, let me change it.

Oopsy daisy, sure.

OK, thanks for the specificity.

The building looks like it only has breezeways so does it really count?

all of my removals were for fixing highway interchanges and interchange adjacent