Darn, beat me too it.

I forgot to respond to this, I do want to say sorry. I was more hostile then I should have been. Just had some people from not around here come in and mass edit especially a lot of golf mappers and had a bit of a gut reaction. I think this is mostly all fine I can correct anything small with sidewalks with biking permitted there is some complexity in that situation with some being recognized bike trails despite not being a wider then a regular sidewalk really, and I have kept things the way I did partly because it was just how it was here when I started nothing really marked as sidewalks.

You asked for a review, the edits to the Pathfinder look good, the way the road was attached to the water tap I don't believe is correct, I can clean up the roads a bit in that area. As well I think amenity=drinking_water would have been a good tag to add to that public water faucet as I assume this is drinking water?

That is nice sweety.

This has stuff mounted to the top like a typical mast or tower that is not a radiator/antenna its self. It has guying which to my knowledge is the main defining difference between it being a tower.

How is this not tagging for whatever render that is if it is assuming all footways are hiking trails, especially when hiking routes are a thing. My understanding has always been sidewalks are directly attached and along a given road and exclusive to pedestrians, and plenty of stuff curves off away from roads especially on K-State campus, I don't know what all further your planing to do here. Some of these also are areas where bikes are intended to also share it on paths in town. Especially as the city has been widening some and making them multi use trails. For example the one on Anderson going the length of it is endorsed by the city as a place to ride bikes on, seems odd to label it a sidewalk.

Local mapper here in Kansas, a lot of the imports that were done in Topeka over a decade ago were of exceptionally poor quality, duplicate data and the address information was poorly aligned to the point you couldn't tell what house it went to. The import never should have been permitted to happen, removing it and starting clean was agreed to be the most reasonable option

some of these landuses overlap what i would call other landuses grass with clumps of trees ect, also they are overlapping the river in areas, and just not done with the precision to the quality of imagery available. You might want to slow down a bit and take your time

That railway is the old streetcar line, you have just placed a street over the top of the existing mapped streets, please undo this changeset. It is probably stupid that people map railways that don't exist, but people do and it should have been left that way.

A friend of mine was out there just the other day, and I was going to work on the map out there, beat me to it.

Please stop using names as a description, and please engage with the comments on your other edits.

Again, names are not descriptions and you CAN NOT use Google for any kind of information due to copyright

Also if you need help with anything feel free to reach out, it has been some time since I have been in Osborne, I have spent a lot of time mapping out Downs. There is a slack channel for Openstreetmap US osmus.slack.com and there is a channel for Kansas.

you set the name tag as "This looks like a dog house" that is not a name, names are not descriptions. It was also tagged as an animal shelter, this means a shelter as a facility not just a dog house in the back yard.

The wiki has good information on these tags I would make sure you read any wiki page before using that tag so you can understand how it is used.
name=*

amenity=animal_shelter

Darn, you beat me too it, was going to try and get new imagery here soonish so i could do it.