OpenStreetMap
bisonprarieafternoon's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 127745547 | What is your source for this data, your editing all over so this couldn't have been via a survey or anything. |
|
| 127689914 | Where the heck did you find a source of tracks, I marked them out based on descriptions s but I have never seen a map in all my years of living in Manhattan, and even then not exactly something i wanted in osm, but curious what source you find for it so i can share it with people. |
|
| 126911015 | Hello, glad to see someone else editing here in Manhattan. There did seem to be a few mistakes in the edit which is fine I certainly made some while starting out. You made an overlapping parking lot in Cisco park, i went ahead and deleted the one with less information the new one you put in had more information which is good. Kimball is a secondary road, primary roads are generally like US highways, even state ones tend to get secondary with the exception of when in urban areas which is why Seth Child is a primary despite being a state route. I went ahead and changed that back. I do also just have a question about the construction area marked in CiCo, the county still has it marked as park in the GIS system, and i don't recall seeing any announcement about part of the park being rezoned for commercial construction, though I could have missed this. I didn't know if you had any information about that. |
|
| 126402356 | This is not right, least not fully right. The signs actually spell it differently at each end, which is more or less why i haven't touched it when i was checking road names a few years ago. It is Skyvue at the north end and Sky Vue at the south east side. |
|
| 124021071 | You list "Open Records for Kansas Appraisers" a lot of state data is unclear what copyright it is under and if it can be included in the map based on what i have checked out. What data specifically are you using and what copyright is it under? |
|
| 120232024 | Same issue as with your Burger King edit if you search for Dollar General the ID editor will plug in a lot of the information needed.
|
|
| 120231821 | Hello, the name "Four Season RV Park should be used to tag the whole RV park not just the swimming pool. The name field is not to describe who owns a given object. |
|
| 120231793 | Hello it would be more proper to do "building=yes
For Burger King, you are using the ID editor if you search burger king it will actually put all this information in for the building. |
|
| 120231309 | Hello, this is probably just better left as just a pond, name=* should not be used for descriptions.
Also I see you are another student in a GIS class at Pittsburg State University. Is there anyway you could let us know what teacher you are doing this for maybe share their name or email, can message it to me rather then sharing it on a changeset comment |
|
| 120180013 | These shouldn't be marked as buildings, an area with building=* should only include the actual physical building. These should be marked as landuse=residential
and probably include the parking lots with it as i assume these are all part of the Crimson Villas complex. |
|
| 119978490 | There is already a house node for that location would have been better to move and then turn that into an area. Also putting names on houses is incorrect. "some rules are: Do not map where individual people live, in particular do not add the names of inhabitants to dwellings."
|
|
| 120169643 | sport=shot-put would be a valid tag if they are for shotput, could also just leave them as a genetic pitch for now if your unsure. |
|
| 120141969 | Hey I would advise against doing this type of clean up here, the person who imported these things with the old landuse tags don't actually correspond to how we use landuse in OSM. So a lot of the farmland and others end up include pasture which would be meadow and stuff considered farmyard. Just changing the tags makes this no better and if not worse, I have been debating just deleting all these as it was a really bad import done over a decade ago |
|
| 116561244 | Hello, A lot of these buildings aren't squared your using the ID editor so make sure you press q to square up the buildings. Also the reason the buildings footprints might not match the default imagery Bing could very well be that Bing was wrong. Judging by some traces in the area i think ESRI imagery is more accurate. If you live in the area a few GPS trace could allow you to align the bing imagery closer to the correct location. I can't say what imagery is newest the ESRI imagery is from 2017 not sure how old the Bing stuff is. I sent you a link to the OpenStreetMap Slack they can help guide you as I see you are new. |
|
| 62185190 | http://www.bradnerstadium.com/
|
|
| 62185202 | Do you have a source for this city changing, name searching around I can't find evidence of it. Wikipedia still has it under the old name, and searching the name gives me no news mentioning a name change
|
|
| 62180267 | If that is a roundabout it is not mapped quite correctly. I am not an expert in mapping roundabouts, but just going how they should be tagged it is missing some information. Here is the wiki article on it
|
|
| 62180060 | The address node should be separate from the way for the road, the name tag is also not to be used for a description of the object, but what it is called, like the name of a road.
|
|
| 62113138 | Hello, when mapping houses please try to map to the building footprint on the ground, and please make sure you are making use of the squaring tool in the ID editor.
|
|
| 60937530 | Hello, just curious where you can find information on this park I can't seem to find evidence of its existence, did you maybe mean to mark this as residential area? Also the name was put on the top right node rather then the area just a fyi. |