Hi Ilona, I see in your resent edits you're mainly adding fixme tags. That's off course OK, but I wonder the value over notes. It's even more apreciated if you just execute your suggestion; Mapillary is a valid source. In this case, just add 'maxspeed=60' in the tags of the road.
If you have any question, let me know. For this and connected ways, I'll add the maxspeed for you.

Use landuse=allotments. Supermarket is than wrong. A node with 'shop=yes' could be used, with an additional description of the situation.

Hi, thank you for your contribution. If the road only for parking purposes, you can use highway=parking_aisle. (parkeerplaats straatje). A road towards a car parking can be tagged with highway=service. These kind of roads are rendered a little less present (smaller lines).
Can you manage that?

:) I'll take your word for it. I've gone over most of your recent changesets, and they look OK to me. All that wasn't correct, I've commented on. So please take a moment to review those and reply where I commented.
Als het makkelijker is, mogen je beschrijvingen binnen Nederland, ook in het Nederlands.
Kind regards, arvdk

de link is 'dood'. Misschien doorverwijzen naar "osm.wiki/w/index.php?title=Mechanical_Edits/Math1985/Dutch_Shop_Names" ?

De geschiedenis van een point/way/relation is op te vragen door aan de link ( node/3748277181 ) '/history' toe te voegen" node/3748277181/history

Hi Superlimonade,
Via OpenStreetMap.org kan je ook in de geschiedenis kijken van bepaalde punten. Daar zie je dat Math1985 Spar heeft veranderd naar SPAR. Jij hebt dit weer terug gedraaid. Is dat in overleg gebeurd met hem? (zie changeset/35654029 )

You can add the gate too, on a node:
"Barrier=gate" (or see barrier=* for a more appropriate tag)

Thank you for your contributions. A few points of feedback:
- The footpaths at the edges of the park need to be connected to the adjacent roads, otherwise the router does not see a connection, so takes the detour.
- One footpath is crossing water. Split the footpath before and after the water, and tag it with 'bridge=yes'. The wiki has a lot of bridge tags, so if you want, you can even describe material, width, ... etc.
Let me know if you need help on this. arvdk

Thank you for your contribution. I'm no local, so I assume you are right on the pedestrian street. But a few comments:
- The fee tag is still there. Now people need to pay for walking there..
- The pedestrian street is not connected to anything. For routing (pedestrians), this piece of street is therefore not used. Therefore, you could delete it or connect it to roads and footpaths.

What is your source for the playground you added to the top/right? ( node/5267555269 )
I couldn't see it on the PDOK luchtfoto beeldmateriaal 2016, so just checking if it's correct.
(Note: if you are a local, please add source:local knowledge to either your changeset or the added features.)

The road you added, is that a 2 way road? Besides, I think you can add the same name there as the other parts of that street. Copy also the maxspeed.

There are about 25 changesets with this description. This is the second one where it does not apply. If you really with to not comment (depreciated), than use 'no comment'. I want to request you to go over all your previous changesets and add a proper description in the discussion of that changeset. Kind regards, arvdk

Please mind your description. It's incorrect. You added a tree.
Openstreetmap is a project we work on together. A proper and correct description is really helpful.

http://overpass-api.de/achavi/?changeset=54398717 Giving it a closer look, it turns out you only deleted information. My bad. So, there is no grass there?

Hi Stef Heijen,
Unfortunately, you are one of many who get it wrong. Tagging something as park should be EXTRA, not instead of the landuse. The information of the surface (grass) is now lost. Please revert your contribution and ADD a new area with the park tag. Thanks, arvdk

Reactie per PB ontvangen. Bedankt.

Perfect. Thank you for your contribution.

'De groene kapper', you added address information to it. That is almost always wrong, since in the Netherlands, all address information is already present, due to BAG Imports. If you now search for the address*, you get 2 hits. Could you please merge them? In next eddits, try to search for the existing address, and use that one. Thanks,
*) osm.org/search?query=74%20meeuwenlaan%2C%20amsterdam#map=19/52.38473/4.91791&layers=N

Removed pedrestrian crossing. Took a while before I got that. Yes, that also resolves the issue. :)