OpenStreetMap logo OpenStreetMap

Changeset When Comment
62393198

It was named that when I mapped it, but likely they abandoned it now.

74567370

reverted, seo spam

74462393

I've added the club=sport tag to this.

73822580

documenting this changeset was reverted in changeset/73962085

73822580

@ecoeng Changeset comments are to provide context or a description of what the change is and why it's being made, not to make personal attacks against other contributors.

I invite you to join in the discussion at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html

70970648

@ecoeng Please see the discussion over at https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au/2019-September/012863.html

74288191

I believe it's common practice not to name link roads (Denham Street), this is also noted at highway=tertiary_link, because in this case the link road is not really part of either road.

68161831

https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68161831/ in this changeset you've dropped the cycleway and surface attributes, I've fixed this up now, but try to watch out for this next time.

74200346

looks good now, thanks.

74151053

I didn't hear back yet, so I've gone ahead and restored these

74200346

Re https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/520768412 is this way no longer a parking aisle? To me it looks like a parking aisle as it runs through the carpark and feeds into spaces, https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/6-HMaOeNnuch3jphlbmmNw

74200346

Regarding https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/639590232 building=service is correct for buildings which house transformers per building=*#Power.2FTechnical_buildings

74200346

The bollard needs to be on the way so that routers know that this bollard affects the way. While I sympathise that you want to map each bollard individually, could you just use a count tag or something instead?

74218277

PS. I'm commenting because you requested a review to your changeset.

74218277

looks good, if you want you could add the phone number in the international format +61 2 xxxx xxxx, which is more correct.

If it's only japanese food I'd leave off the asian cuisine, I'd only use that for a restaurant that either I can't tell which specific type of asian cuisine it is, or it serves a variety of asian cuisine.

48838689

I removed this as a duplicate of node/4242642657.

74151053

It looks like you've changed building=retail to building=yes, if these are shop buildings, then building=retail would be better. Did you want to change it back?

73993556

It's okay to map private driveways in OSM, you can use the access=private tag to indicate private access, I've done this in changeset/73993556.

73984430

@WoodWoseWulf There is way/544057064 many different kinds of grasses side by side there.

73984430

In this context leisure=garden is not talking specifically about the flower bed landuse, it's saying this venue, the Royal Botanic Gardens, is a planned space set aside for cultivation, and enjoyment of plants and other forms of nature.

Those cafes are all part of the gardens venue, since this is not a landuse or landcover tag I think it's fine.

The "woods" inside are all part of the gardens.

You can think of this as a more specific type of park.

Lastly I know the name itself doesn't imply the tags we should use, but it is called Royal Botanic Garden not Royal Botanic Park.