It would be great to documented this tag on the wiki. Currently the only documentation is for the tag you removed osm.wiki/Proposed_features/aerobridge

When using a dual name "name:Mrs Macquaries Point / Yurong", then we need "name:en" to equal "Mrs Macquaries Point" so you can break down that dual name into each language.

It looks like you've changed that back here http://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/node/13816944

If you check the history of https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/179207161 it looks like you've incorrectly removed the oneway tag, which was then fixed by someone else, and then you removed again, and it was fixed again.

Was this a mistake or intentional?

You've accidentally dragged the bicycle parking see https://osmcha.mapbox.com/changesets/68816300/, however I've fixed this now in changeset/75209417

To be honest I couldn't find this documented anywhere on the wiki but now I see https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=destination%3Aref%3Alanes is more popular.so I've added some documentation to the wiki.

reverted see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

reverted see osm.wiki/Spam#SEO_Spam

Fair point, although I wouldn't consider it a lane, I guess the access:lanes=no implies that it isn't a lane. I've changed it back.

What's bicycle=stupid mean here?

Thanks. For the two u turn restrictions relation/10088918 and relation/10088917. Is there any use since the from and to ways are the same?

Sure, building=office is just a sub type of commercial. It does sound like office is more correct here.

https://www.mapillary.com/app/?pKey=33_j2CiGoSuIPmoDONl23g&focus=photo

This does look like a fairly generic commercial building, what's the reasoning behind downgrading to building=yes?

The painted traffic island shouldn't count as a lane. I've changed this to have correct lane counts.

Did you mean to delete admin_level? government=* says it's a useful combination and I used it to say this is a federal level office.

Have these escalators at https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/591448312 and seen at https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=-33.935713888888884&lng=151.1651527777778&z=17&pKey=QgXdlTltdfXp4yK8grWhyg&focus=photo&x=0.39884012279205605&y=0.5745279512762695&zoom=1.3403582718651212 been removed?

Hi, it looks like you've mapped some roundabouts as diveded ways: way/595008484#map=19/-33.95583/150.99427
According to osm.wiki/Editing_Standards_and_Conventions#Divided_highways two ways should only be used when physically separated in a major way. This one here isn't physically separated and regardless a small traffic island doesn't usually need the way to be split. It's a lot easier to model the real road without splitting the way. What do you reckon?
https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/YBC0r-3EudYGLodM57oByg

Thanks! PS. When editing around here if you change to the Maxar background layer it's slightly more up to date than the default background layer.

Roads are assumed to be two way unless specified as oneway. Specifying oneway=no is not harmful, but not needed unless you want to be explicit or if it's unclear and you want to indicate to other mappers this really is two way even though it might look like oneway.

natural=wetland looks like the correct tag see wetland=*

It won't show up blue if you've picked a wetland type which is mostly vegetation.