aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 170414006 | Thanks, I can see in that document it's referring both to "Chatswood North" as the name of a "Local Area Traffic Management (LATM)" which I probably wouldn't think as warranting a place=neighbourhood but also as the "Chatswood North precinct" which probably does warrant place=neighbourhood. place=neighbourhood has varied use in Sydney ranging from GNB assigned urban/rural place names that don't form formal suburb/localities, usually as a area/region of a suburb, but also for named residential estates. I think then it's okay to map "Chatswood North" as a neighbourhood here, though improved tagging practices and tags to better categorise "neighbourhoods" would be good for OSM. |
|
| 170414006 | I've never heard of Chatswood North being used, do you have any references where the phrase is in use? |
|
| 173954910 | osm.wiki/Organised_Editing/Activities/TomTom > TomTom is actively organizing mapping events. All edits made during those events are distinguished by the hashtag #tt_events. > If you have remarks about a specific edit of ours, please drop a comment in the changeset, and we will do our best to respond thoughtfully. Or, you can also: > Reach out to osm@tomtom.com with any questions
They are active in the OSM Discord #oceania channel. |
|
| 173880637 | because of this I've reverted this change. |
|
| 173880637 | unless you have specific local knowledge or survey I think best to leave them apart as different structures, but eitherway the original way should have been retained osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history |
|
| 173881961 | I've reverted this changeset since the history of the original way should have been retained osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history It's likely that the water tank is sitting under the eaves and the building is traced to the gutter not the structural footprint hence causing the overlap. this is a wider mapping issue to be discussed and best to accept the overlap until it can be properly resolved. |
|
| 173882115 | I've reverted this change since the history of the way should have been retained per osm.wiki/Good_practice#Keep_the_history (ie. instead of deleting the building and adding a new one, you could just edit the existing one) furthermore addr:suburb and addr:postcode are discouraged as they are inherited from the existing boundaries. |
|
| 173884183 | I've restored the deleted building and fixed the intersection. |
|
| 173886095 | ||
| 173886095 | The high voltage tower is already mapped at node/1832732134
|
|
| 173443366 | truck isn't a commonly used access key per access=*#Land-based_transportation hgv=* is likely the best tag for "trucks" signage. |
|
| 173472409 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway. |
|
| 173472648 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway |
|
| 173473008 | I've updated the tags to driveway. |
|
| 173473092 | I've updated the tags to driveway and disconnected the road from the power line. |
|
| 173473116 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway |
|
| 173473353 | I've updated the tags to shared driveway |
|
| 173473421 | Per street level imagery this don't connect to Marroondah Highway so I've disconnected it. I've also changed the tags to shared driveway. |
|
| 173473709 | I've updated the tags to a driveway. |
|
| 173474004 | I've updated these to a shared driveway. |