aharvey's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 173474708 | Based ,on your reported imagery used I can't see any evidence that this road connects through, so I've split the way and updated the tags to driveway. |
|
| 173476014 | I've updated the tags to be a driveway |
|
| 173476128 | I've updated the tag here to mark it as a driveway. |
|
| 173477259 | I've updated the tags on these to be Shared Driveways |
|
| 173563166 | I think to meet cyclestreet=* it must be a road that is signposted/marked to be explicitly for bicycles as the primary road users with motor vehicles as secondary users. |
|
| 173568549 | the tag nudism=yes already implies this so no need for a note |
|
| 173656081 | to be honest this looks more urban than rural, given the small block size, dense housing and the road network layout... |
|
| 173695831 | thanks for merging the address nodes with your new building outlines correctly. |
|
| 173740940 | hi this is the footpath not a bridge, therefore I've reverted this change. |
|
| 173817319 | way/758025663 is not representing the lot boundary, it's representing the trees, the south east corner looks like grass only so shouldn't be included unless it's been reforested. |
|
| 173822964 | I've restored the address node node/12411966515 which was deleted in this changeset. |
|
| 170701671 | I've restored the address node node/12411966515 which was dragged to the wrong location in this changeset. |
|
| 173823693 | I've restored the address node node/12419092614 which was deleted here |
|
| 173777581 | Yeah I think it's not right to add this to watercourses outside of a golf course. |
|
| 173828740 | I've reverted this change since added layer=-1 to seemingly ground level buildings which seemingly was done to silence editor warnings. |
|
| 173828992 | I've reverted this change since it removed the building type. |
|
| 173831518 | sorry I didn't see your change here, I just reverted the problematic change. |
|
| 173829084 | I've reverted this change since it deleted all the tags per each semi, and regardless it's better to have each semi mapped individually. |
|
| 173829902 | layer=* implies one building is over or under another, but if both are at ground level then it's unlikely adding a layer=* is the correct way to resolve overlapping buildings. |
|
| 173829113 | from the imagery this building does appear to exist so I've reverted this deletion, though it needs a survey to confirm. |