Dakujem, aj ked je v skutocnosti o dom vedla na cisle 10.

Dakujem.
Nabuduce poprosim pouzit uz existujuci bod z predchadzajuceho obchodu node/7885403034 , ktory so shop=vacant reprezentuje prazdne obchodne priestory a presne caka na zaplnenie novym obchodom. To iste aj vedla s kaviarnou "Strettko".

Zdravim, na tomto mieste Party Confetti nie je. Je predsa davno zakreslene o par metrov dalej, node/12062162894 . Pri vysokych domoch je GPS velmi nepresna. Trebasi polohu kontrolovat relativne podla vchodov, inych obchodov a pod.

Ano, tiez mi to pride trochu nesystemove, ze su priechody, ktore nemaju highway=crossing. Mozno staci ze existuje crossing=* a uz je to priechod pre chodcov? Tie tagy crossing:* sa pridat daju. Inak nie vzdy musi byt highway=crossing, moze tam byt napr. railway=crossing ci ine.

A ake je teda riesenie oznacit pre navigaciu ktore semafory spolu suvisia? Ked je na jednom zelena (pre auta) tak na druhom (pre chodcov) bude urcite cervena a teda netreba dvojitu penalizaciu?
Samozrejme riesenie highway=traffic_signals spolu s crossing=traffic_signals riesi len miesto na vjazde do krizovatky. Napr. node/992757560 . Ale ak auto prejde tymto bodom a ma zelenu, tak mozno bude mat zelenu (a chodci cervenu) aj na priechode za krizovatkou node/992704848 . A tam zatial ziadna indicia pre navigaciu nie je. Takze penalizacie su stale 2 (uz aspon namiesto 3), ale mala by byt len 1.

A vsimnite si, ze bod s highway=traffic_signals spolu s crossing=traffic_signals ma aj v JOSM specialnu ikonu (semafor pre auta a zaroven pre chodcov, cize 5 svetiel), takze zrejme je toto dost rozsirene po svete.

OK, you put the source (SRTM) onto each object (good) but with the wrong tag (as t_ja explains). You did not write any source onto the changeset and also did not reference the description of the import and the community acceptance of this import, see osm.wiki/Import/Guidelines .

It seems this user is automatically generating all these elevations from some height data, without any mention of the process (import description) and even tagging problems. He does it across the world. This must be stopped and reverted.

Hi, what is the source of this data? Is this just automatically generated from some source like SRTM or DMR5.0? You did not provide any source thus this whole changeset is very dubious even aside the technical problems t_ja mentions.

Zdravim, preco davate na pristresky MHD aj building=yes? Normalne pristresky nie su budovami, ak nie su nejake masivne a murovane. Ale to z Ortofotomozaiky nevidite. Takze zase si tu vymyslate?

Hi, why is a monastery called a "park" and not the leisure=park object?

Ano jedna znacka hovori o semafore pre chodcov a druha pre auta. Ono ked maju jedni zelenu tak druhi maju cervenu, takze je to prepojeny objekt. Ide tu o logiku veci, a v principe je jedno sci predsuniete semafor pre auta o par metrov pred priechod pre chodcov. Ale ak to urobite, ako ma navigacia vediet, ci tieto dva semafory spolu suvisia alebo nie? Da tam dvojitu penalizaciu (ked idete autom), raz za semafor pre auta, potom za priechod pre chodcov (so semaformi, cize asi tam je aj semafor pre auta, takze sa moze niekedy stat).
Toto pouzitie som videl na wiki highway=traffic_signals#How_to_map_(new) a robim to tak uz 10 rokov. Iste ak je lepsi sposob tak mam zaujem.

Yes, urns are burried in the ground at the whole cemetery. But what does exist at the place you marked as way/477382816 ? How do you see from the images, that there are any urns specifically as this location under the grass?

First, it is not allowed to use Wikipedia to add data into OSM, the licenses are not compatible.
Second, please point to the "plan" you mean, because what I see is that the photo https://sk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kremat%C3%B3rium_a_Urnov%C3%BD_h%C3%A1j_v_Bratislave#/media/S%C3%BAbor:WP_20151027_13_12_32_Pro.jpg shows exactly that there is no columbarium at the spot where you added it. The photo shows a large grass area with steps/footway on top side...

Dakujem. A je tato databaza verejna, ci aka je licencia, ze sa smie pouzit do OSM? A odkial boli ziskane udaje do tejto databazy?
Aj ked podla wiki stranky k tomuto tagu su vsetky bazililiky (okrem 4) na svete 'minor', tak je otazny prinos celeho tohto znacenia...

Dakujem. Mame povolenie odpisovat udaje z tejto globalnej stranky do OSM? Okrem toho tieto ferraty maju aj vlastnu lokalnu webstranku.

A na tu Jelsovu ste neodpovedali. Ano jedna ferrata je mostom a aj sa vola Lanovy most. Preco ste ale ako most (bridge=yes) oznacili aj ferratu Jelsova (way/1423059018/history/1 )?

Hi, I don't think there ever was a columbarium at this place and with such size. Do you have any photos of the object? You do not mention any sources.

Dost zbytocne sekanie ciest way/1144362394 a vytvaranie trojuholnikov, kde ziadne fyzicke oddelenie pruhov neexistuje. Skoda potom tiez prace s tolkymi zbytocnymi relaciami zakazov odbocenia.

Zdravim, aky je zdroj Vasich udajov? Ortofoto asi nie.

Zdravim, to cela trasa Jelsova je zaroven mostom?

A odkial su tie nazvy a obtiaznosti tras? Z Ortofotomozaiky nie. Su na mieste popisne tabule?

Zdravim, typ mosta sa nedava ako jeho nazov, ale do prislusnych znaciek bridge, ci bridge:structure . Mate to este aj uvedene na highway=via_ferrata .

Zdravim, bohuzial, stale nespravne presuvate budovy. Sice pisete, ze podla Ortofoto, ktora uz je tu celkom dobra, ale nesedi to. Budova ma byt v OSM umiestnena podla podorysu, tam kde sa dotyka zeme. Nie tam kde sa premieta jej strecha podla sikmeho fotografovania z vysky. Ak si nie ste isty, podlozte si aj vrstvu katastra. Videli by ste, ze kataster sedi s Ortofotomozaikou lepsie ako co ste vytvoriili Vy. Tieto posuny na MediaHouse a inde nie su spravne a boli zbytocne, lebo aj budovy so source=kapor2 su z katastra. A casto su dobre, ak budovu neprestavali.