Oh, this was the note with discussion: note/3764067

There was some discussion a while back regarding the use of "SR xx" vs "UT xx" - see note/3764072 by user keithalleman. Do you have any comments about reasoning one way or another?

Hmm, I see. I think you're right that it could go either way.

Assuming you were onsite, would you say the park area extends to the northward into the grass as well? Either way, welcome (back) to OSM and thanks for your contributions!! :)

Can you give some more info on what the idea is here?

Hi there! Thanks for your contributions. Just want to welcome you to OSM and to the valley!

Researching it a little more, it looks like a proposal was put forward recently, but it was rejected. :( osm.wiki/Proposal:Cell_reception

I think it is really useful to know whether there is cell signal somewhere. However, I wonder if tagging it this way will confuse those looking for public WiFi? The wiki for internet_access=wlan seems to show that it's used for WiFi hotspots.

Gotcha. That makes sense!

Is piste:name even necessary here since it's the same as the general name?

Looks good to me. IIRC the general rule is that separate ways are only valid when there's physical separation (grass, concrete barrier, etc.) but there are exceptions like parking aisles and stuff. I'd say everything there looks reasonable.

Hi, have you been to this location? These bleachers aren't a building. They just provide seating.

It's starting to seem like users should need to be whitelisted or something before being able to post comments or diary entries with links...

Do you know what the right way to specify the parking lot as being an "inner" area of the larger scrub multipolygon? I know how when the inner is all one way, but not sure when it's split up like you've done.

Hi, and welcome to OSM! Here are a few tips to work better with the community:
- Add a changeset comment so that others know what you changed.
- Save, upload, etc. your changes in one area before moving on to another.
- It looks like a few of these are duplicates of existing nodes. Be sure to check for existing data before adding new stuff on top.
Again, welcome, and thanks for your contributions!

Hi, and welcome again to OpenStreetMap! Your edits look good overall, but since you've asked for review, here are a couple of tips:
- It's best to avoid overlapping buildings and parking lots. Feel free to improve/adjust the building outlines as necessary to prevent this. More accuracy is always better.
- In the iD (online) editor, you can press "Q" to make shapes square.
- It looks like you've added a couple of commercial landuse areas to try and indicate "holes" in parking lots. A better way to do this is to draw the hole outline, then select both that and the outer parking lot, and press "C" to combine them into a multipolygon relation. Let me know if you want more info or explanation on how these work.

As always, thanks for your contributions!

Also, welcome to OSM!! :)

Just a tip, when drawing rectangular features in iD you can press "Q" to square up their corners. This makes them look much better when rendered.

Nice, thanks!! And that makes sense for the stop number. I agree that it should be what's marked on the sign.

That bus stop path by the Family Life building is new enough to not be on some satellite imagery, or maybe they really did tear it out!? (right on the highway there)