Warin61's Comments
| Changeset | When | Comment |
|---|---|---|
| 117629999 | Hi, This one too fails PTV2 .. see
|
|
| 117630029 | Hi,
|
|
| 117595296 | Good. I would try to fit the route members to fit into either 'Public Transport version 1' or, my preference, 'Public Transport version 2'. I did a simple guide to v2 on @Warin61/diary/45106, mainly so I could refer to it when I got confused! Sometimes the OSM wiki is not the best for a quick guide - which is what I want most of the time. Been discussing this on the talk-au list ... There is a use of the key 'passenger' that I was not aware of .. passenger=tourist may be a good tag to add to your routes. |
|
| 117595296 | Hi,
|
|
| 117615515 | Hi,
I suggest using the tag 'description' for things like "Wyndham TV Transmission site", or 'operator' for "Coleman Transport". I have increased the industrial area for "Wyndham TV Transmission site" to encompass the area that appears to be used. The circular- buildings might be man_made=silo? |
|
| 117543427 | Hi,
|
|
| 29013294 | Hi,
|
|
| 115136339 | Hi,
|
|
| 117378197 | Hi, When a footway crosses a building .. there is either an entrance - should be mapped as a node on both the footway and building, or the building is a roof and should be tagged layer=1 (or 1 higher than the footway layer).
|
|
| 117180958 | One of the 'problems' is that renders regard landuse=forest to be the same as natural=wood. The Putty State Forest includes grass areas .. and residential areas ... these should not be excluded form it. Much like a National Park has tree areas, rock areas, grass areas.. all part of the National Park. The mapper who added the large tree area is simply mapping trees - not the land use. |
|
| 86636232 | Hi,
Usually the dominate land cover is mapped, so if mostly trees then natural=wood, if mostly grass then landcover=grass (and the ridiculous landuse=grass so it renders). If both grass and trees must be mapped then we get micro mapping .. So I have made an example change - see relation/13780764 |
|
| 117180958 | Hi, The Putty State Forest is not a land cover ... and should not be changed to match tree cover or any other land cover. The Putty State Forest is truly a 'land USE'.
|
|
| 115280135 | Hi, The park way/142127344 crossed itself, I have corrected that using Bing imagery. I have also removed the connection between the park way and the adjacent road. |
|
| 117033716 | Note that my comments stated the past tense. I have already made corrections. relation/13761878 was created in this changeset.
|
|
| 117033716 | Hi,
Suggest - map the fences with separate gates. Then include them in a relation for the brown field - the relation only has tags for the brown field not fences nor gates. |
|
| 116898813 | Hi,
tag dog=yes to dog=unleashed
Keep mapping! The bush does need it. |
|
| 32752693 | Hey, thanks for that ...
so amenity=doctors would be more appropriate. Now I've go to go back and check my clinic entries! Doh! |
|
| 116808232 | Hi, The 'brownfield' 'Log Cabin Hotel' relation is in error... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.68261&lat=-33.74737&zoom=17 |
|
| 32752693 | Clinic? Or doctors?
|
|
| 32752693 | Flat Products Medical Centre ... does not appear to be a hospital... I have removed that tag and left the name and building... |