The "Forestry Corporation of NSW" is the correct name for the operator of State Forests in NSW.
The "Forestry Corporation" is a shortened version of the full name and could be confused with other states operators.

The easiest thing for me to do is delete it. You can then re-enter the parking area.

How should I 'close it'?????
Note the imagery does not show any car paring here at all so I have no guide.

Hi,

Muiltipolygons outer ways should not have the same tags on them as the relation.

I have fixed relation/12305019 (grass fairway).

Deleted.

Hi,
relation/12336738 (parking lot) is not closed. I cannot see it on imagery so cannot 'fix it'.
See relation/12336738#map=19/-33.61489/149.13792

I'd think it should be a simple closed way?

The comment remains. And is directed at the mapper who made the changes... comments made do get flagged to the mapper.

The stated source is DCS Imagery. The changes made are not on the DCS imagery.
So what is the source of this (and other) changes???

This does not appear on the DCS imagery... what is the source of this information?
It does look something like it in the Maxar ... however it is still being constructed there. The DCS Base Map is better...

Reasons why I ask? I'm looking at your Grafton Jail edits and cannot see the information in the source provided.

Best to say what the imagery is then so as not to confuse nor strain your memory in a few years time.
Does 'Go Map' not access the usual imagery that OSM has ready access to?

What app you are using is easily seen - eg look at changeset/99664314.

The relation problem I sent you a comment some 2 days ago on another relation - this is just a repeat of the same problem.

Have fun.

Arr .. good oh.
I came across it as these were used for the council boundaries .. the changes made the boundaries wrong. I have remove them from the roads using the PSMA data.

Errr ... imagery use Gmaps Sat? Is that Google related?

Hi,

Are the building, car park really not part of the resort???

By making them 'inners' in the relation they are excluded from the resort.

Hi,

Think you may have the construction mixed up with the existing road - see Way: The Northern Road (369219092)

Hi,

The 'inners' would be part of the club. As 'inners' in the relation they are excluded from being part of the club... So I don't think it is correct for the club.

----------------------------------
Next .. the 'outer' way is tagged as a building.. and an 'inner' is also tagged as a building .. you cannot have a building inside a building ..
See building:part for something like a building inside a building. building:part=*

If the outer way is the limit of the club only then it should not have a building tag .. probably landuse=recreation_ground.

highway=closed is not valid.

I have set the old section of the Pacific Hwy to
disused:highway=trunk

Hi
For the Ghan - under public transport V2 I don't think places where the train does not stop should be in the route relation.

What should be in the relation are places it does stop... those are missing.

The other thing is the direction .. the relation is only for one direction as tracks and stops can be on different sides, at least in some places.

Fixed:
Way: 476166959 removed from relation. Then looked at what it did .. absolutely nothing - so deleted.

Way: 907255818 - combined with other outer ways in forest relation to make one simple way.
Way: 476166964 (landuse=quarry) entered in relation forest as an inner.

See changeset/99499873#map=13/-38.2881/146.5879

Thanks.
Not familiar with the area at all.

Andrew - looks like the State Park could do with some land cover mapping.

Error ...

Building SAGE inside building Tonsley MAB...

Possibly use building:part ?

Hi,
relation/12318197 is not closed - meaning it does not form an area.

Why is this a multipolygon at all? Would a simple closed way not do the job? Same question for 80 collins st... a simple way would do.