The way 'Auburn Bowling Club' has no real major tag - one that will render. Add 'landuse=recreation_ground' and that should then render.

Wyong Station.

Has 3 platforms. You have look to mislabeled the platform numbers ignoring the platform to the east .. which should be platform 1, then your platform 1 becomes 2 while 2 becomes 3...

Hi,
The Hamilton platform numbers look wrong.
Platform 1 is normally the up line, leading to Newcastle (so this would be on the north eastern side) ... but you have tagged it on the down line leading away from Newcastle. Similar for platform 2.

Note that all the other station platforms follow this pattern on this and other lines.

Please see new relation for 'Hunter line to Scone'
relation/12409977

to come:
'Hunter line from Scone'
'Hunter line to Dungog'
'Hunter line from Dungog'

Note New lines added to make them continuous. Some guess work as to where track changes take place, I think this will change with what traffic there is on the lines andway.

Errr 4 routes...

Arr yes... This is acually tagged as a 'route' as such it should go from A to B.. as it is in OSM it was A to B .. and C to B and B to A and B to C.. these need to entered as 2 routes.. working on it.

I was thinking this was a 'railway line' rather than a route .. but I stand (sit) corrected.

No need to have a relation for a simple way.
The parking area by it self would have no name, the name "Woodgrove Shopping Center" would be on the entire shopping center.

Arr I think I see what is going on... sigh. Relax... I'll just run in circles a bit more...

Hi,

Umm some of these lines are 'Up' not 'Down' ... they run to Central not away.

This is confusing me no end.

e.g Way: 147042409...

Multi level gets difficult. I don't think you'd be mapping floors inside the building just yet :)

Map the dog leg ground floor normally.

For the floors 2 and 3 map it as highway=footway, covered=yes, layer=1 (this puts it above the ground in OSM) and level=1 (this is 1st floor level=0 is the ground floor which is the default. This leaves out level=2 and at this stage I don't think that will worry anyone.
You can always ask the OSMwiki for guidance - see osm.wiki/Simple_Indoor_Tagging#Advanced_modelling_the_different_levels_.28floors.29 Note indoor mapping is very primitive at this stage.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM.

I have partial reverted this in order to restore some administration boundaries.
I have also modified the apron so that relation is now correct.

Please try to improve your changeset comments - see changeset/100406510#map=16/-33.9332/151.1790 for some idea.

Possibly try something simpler closer to home? Keep mapping.

relation/12384632 is not correct. See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.10104&lat=-35.34505&zoom=18

Personally this looks like a walkway and might be better as highway=footway, covered=yes???

OK, I have updated the India Pacific train route so it is now correct.

Hi,

'operator=forests NSW' changed to 'Forestry Corporation of NSW'.

Except for Helipad - Kookaburra - looks to be NPWS now?

The Maxar imagery looks more upto date than bing.

Is this now in operation? Or are the old lines still being used?

Note: tags should be added for electrification - same as the connecting lines.

See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.89581&lat=-32.00707&zoom=18

I see some ~ 17 errors ....

Hi,

way/907615451 (wood) has no area - it just forms a line. I have deleted this way.

The 'imagery used' should state the source for the information used in the changeset. OpenStreetMap (Standard) could not be the source for this change. Possibly Bing imagery ... or a personal survey or something else?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

The DCS base map suggests that the park has a larger area and the boundary is slightly different from the river.

The park is not a boundary for the Hampton administration area, so I have removed it from there.

Forbes 'office' is a plant nursery .. and I've retagged it as such. Source: annual report FC of NSW + visual imagery shows nursery outside ..

Glens Creek is incorrect near the end - southern, the named creek goes further to the east rather than to the west.

Buccarumbi Creek - the source end ... there is no name on the base map for the end .. so that should not carry the name.

Both creeks are tagged 'intermittent' .. where did that information come from??? There is reasonable rainfall in this area .. I would expect them to have water most of the time.

When you changed Old Glen Innes Road you should remove or alter the source tag as 'survey' no loner applies to 'asphalt'