Hi,
Would it not be 'better' (what ever that means) to join between the natural features to form a closed relation??? At the moment this relation throws errors ..

Done it myself - trees in the blue mountains... That automated tool put me in my place. Usually the tool is run with a 5 meter acceptable accuracy .. I run it with 0.5 meter as that to me retains more of the actual shape.

Umm .. we all make errors and the future is hopefully a long time. Keep mapping and don't be scared of making errors.

Issues;
Data bloat
Who needs more accuracy than 0.5 metres? Consider most people would be unable to resolve 0.5 metres...

There were two relation for the park.. pick one and one only?
One feature = one OSM entry.

I picked the one that looked to have the most detail.

When an area, such as a building, has the way cross itself ... what part is the area for the building? Is the small bit that is formed by the crossing part of the building or not?
This is not a personal problem for me but one of data confusion. See osm.wiki/Self_intersecting_way_reports

@ fortera_au
Driveways can terminate at garages i.e. a building. You might like to mention which driveway the comment is directed at?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
I have restored Node: 2548179394 back to where it was. This is used by administrative boundaries (suburbs etc) and is sourced from government data. Not the end of the world...
Keep mapping, have fun.

The pool ways have far too much resolution! They have been simplified with an automatic tool - maximum error of 0.5 meters.

Hi
way/891936930 crosses itself.

Hi
way/1317550766 crosses itself.

Hi
way/1317344351 (building house) self intercepts. Part of it looks like a separate garage.

Hi
way/1317342610 self intercepts.. Looks like it has been 'squared' when it is not a square. Suggest mapping the grey roof area alone as the house, the rest are garages, carports and service buildings...

Hi,
The multipolygone relation is not correct - shared segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.25924&lat=-35.29263&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Personally I'd not tag this area as all trees - some of it is grass .... I'd tag some as tree row..

Hi
way/1316872614 self intersects..

Hi,
way/1316561107 (grass) is not correct, it intersects itself ..
see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=149.12449&lat=-35.29970&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Pity it brakes the rules for a multipolygon relation ... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.85584&lat=-32.28382&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Perhaps a site relation?

Hi,

The DCS Imagery now shows detail for things here. However another mapper looks to be using Esri imagery that is 'different' from others .. which imagery is more upto date???

Some mapped buildings at mona vale hospital don't appear in bing imagery nor DCS imagery .. Source??? Esri???

relation/14309095 Canberra Xplorer train route errors..
Stop or platform at end of relation
Stop position in wrong order
There could be others...