YOU can see the problem for the next few hours on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=147.20206&lat=-42.53316&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
Ar a node was deleted by you in changeset/133653203. This fixed the problem.

You do need to work on those errors/warnings.

In this area JOSM validator reports some 16 errors and 121 warnings...

Errors (16)
Duplicated ways (1)
Highway duplicated nodes (10)
Multipolygon is not closed (1)
Multipolygon ring contains segment twice (3)
Overlapping highways (1)
Warnings (121)
area on a relation (1)
Crossing building/highway (7)
Crossing highways (60)
highway=footway together with foot=no (1)
highway=footway together with maxspeed=40 (1)
missing tag - man_made=tower without tower:type (1)
Mixed type duplicated nodes (23)
node connects highway and building (3)
Route scheme is unspecified. Add public_transport:version (2=public_transport; 1=legacy) (1)
Self-intersecting polygon ring (1)
Unconnected nodes without physical tags - No tags (2)
Unnamed ways (12)
Way end node near other highway (8)

Hi,

relation/15577991 does not make sense? natural=wood;heath err no. It is either heath or wood. And both members are 'outers' yet one is inside the other.
Looks to me like way/1152292927 should be tagged natural=wood (as it was before this changeset) and then have the role 'inner' in the relation. The relation should be tagged natural=heath

See what you think.

Hi,
Golf is a problem in OSM...

Relation 14005754 - "self intersects" where grass crosses the sand bunker

Other 'golf problems' can be found on https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.84688&lat=-39.89667&zoom=17&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Hi,
The JOSM validator would have issued the warning message "crossing ways' ...There is only one, way/435781531. Would you please look at it and correct it?

Similar issue here

Way are not in sequence order.

For other errors see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=pubtrans_routes&lon=151.28155&lat=-33.84362&zoom=9&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=ptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes%2Cptv2_routes_valid%2Cptv2_routes_invalid%2Cptv2_error_ways%2Cptv2_error_nodes

For basic hints on PTv2 see @Warin61/diary/45106

Hi,
This does not meet the PTv2 rules...

Does not start with the stops.

Role 'stop' is not used for stops.

Are the stops in sequenced order?
Are way in sequence order?

Changeset reverted to restore the above 2 train routes. Looking at the past non response this is the easiest thing for me to do.

You have not responded to any changeset comment in the past 4 months. Are you getting these comments??? Please respond.

Note This rail route no longer exists... some bits of the rail line may exist, as would some stations. But the route is gone.

This broke train route relation/3165393 PTv2. The liverpool stop has no role.

This broke the train route relation/3165393 PTv2. Do you know how to fix it?

The liverpool stops have no role. There should be only one liverpool stop for this route. The liverpool stop is not in sequential order...

Thanks nev.

Oh .. just found this

https://www.dcceew.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/directory.pdf

I'm using 'landform' tag like landcover and landuse. So for things like cliffs peaks .. The 'natural' tag is used for both land forms and land covers .. and is use for both natural things and man effected things.. so to me the tag 'natural' does not make much sense.

Floodplains vs lakes.. like you said .. water remains in lakes .. so I think they are deeper than a floodplain. Lot of 'estimations' going on - we do the best we can. The landform tag has few uess so I am fairly confident that what it says is what it is rather than being a tag for the render. I have used it for dry swamps. The numbers tell me that most (90%?) 'natural=mud' in Australasia is dry swamp ...

I am trying to map the 'new' National Park area to the north - done tracks and water features - named creeks, reservoirs and bores and a few missing lakes (at least to the DCS Base Map).

Hi,

Should not the Glen Valley Reserve also incorporate the Glen Valley Road Flood Retarding Basin. The reserve would be a more frequent use of the area???

I have retagged the basin as a landuse=basin, basin=detention.

Hi,
Way: 319796961 tagged natural=water, I have added intermittent=yes. However I question if the tag natural=water is all that 'good'? The DCS Base Map shows 'Land subject to inundation' and I think that here is a flood plain ?? Yes, I know OSM does not have a tag for that yet.. but there is a proposal... Thoughts?

Hi,
Welcome to OSM...

I have made a minor improvement to the roundabout - way/414452307. By selecting it and pressing the keyboard letter 'O' it makes it a perfect circle. For 'square' buildings pressing the letter 'Q' will square them up.

Hi,Hiking routes are better mapped as relations - see route=hiking

They then render well on https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#routelist?map=12.0/-30.0274/153.2387 - you can even get an elevation profile and gpx track.. These routes also show up on some phone apps - such as OSMand.

I have extended the relation - only gaps now where the water is deep?