I'm not seeing that as an allowed source in the Aust. Data Catalogue..???
osm.wiki/Australian_Data_Sources#Victoria

Hi,
The relation/12950672 has Way: 1085307271 tagged as an inner .. but that has no outer around it.. that is an error. I am not familiar with it so I'll leave you to fix it.

Other than imagery .. what evidence do you have that Way: 1150596619 is a wetland???

Same error in relation/15518947 as in your past changeset changeset/131835596

You should fix these so as you don't continue to repeat the error.

The changes you made with this changeset are already in OSM ..

See changeset/133155781

On the left section, if you scroll down, are the individual elements .. eg. building, paths etc .. you can click on these to see them. OSM is very powerful and quick to get new stuff up .. slower with changes to old stuff.

Note .. where a path enters a building there should be a node tagged entrance.. there are a number of other 'issues' e.g. the loop road .. a fragment exists by it self ... and the bit that goes out to the external road is probably a highway=service, service=driveway???

This has broken train route relations... only the 'up' routes..
Sydney XPT
North West Xplorer 244
Hunter Line from Scone
Hunter Line from Dungog

The 'down' routes look good. All the above fixed.

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
Thanks for the initial contribution. Looks like Maxar imagery is more upto date than Bing in this area.
You certainly have taken the bull by the horns! A few hints? Keep it simple, Do small bits at a time - map the building by itself ... then separately map a footpath.. this makes it easier to follow what the warning are talking about as you will have less of them to understand.

Hi
Way: 1148772981 looks to me to be more landuse=commercial rather than landuse=residential???

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!
Some hints?
Buildings are usually 'square' meaning their corners are right angles. When you make a 'square' building pressing the 'Q' key should 'square' up the building making it look better.
Bing imagery if fairly good.. but DCS imagery tends to have better accuracy and resolution.

Hi,
Error in relation 15526451
Way: 1149122465 cross itself - duplicated nodes... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.82254&lat=-33.88005&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Ill leave this alone so you can see it.

I have fixed it.
For how it was broken the route ways were not in sequence. See @Warin61/diary/45106

I keep an eye on 2 bus routes I entered. Because they may not have changed for some period of time does not mean they are 'unmaintained'.

Hi,

This has broken the bus route relation/3331347 No 711

Hi,
The relationship 15509013 Vibrance Studios is wrong - the inner way touches the outer. It would have been better left as it was -a simple way. Do you want me to fix this?

Hi
The community garden would include the veg etc plots???

The "name' Vegitables, Fruit ... well those are descriptions... see osm.wiki/Names#Name_is_the_name_only

Keep mapping.

Hi,
There is a problem with one of these houses... see https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=151.08833&lat=-33.99812&zoom=19&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The DCS Imagery gives better resolution than bing , and has better location accuracy too.

OK. I'll unname the track that the base map shows without a name.

I'll add the press reported name as 'loc_name=Clover Hill Trail' .. and call it 'good enough' :)

Hi,
Welcome to OSM!

Muiltpolygons are one of the harder things to understand. The one you have made here is not correct. see relation/15479996.

The firest meber way/871161920 encompasses the whole lake the other ways simply duplicate segments of this way. Best to keep the map as simple as possible, that would be done bt tagging way/871161920 as a lake, then deleting the other member ways in the relation and then the relation it self. \
For more info on multipolygon relations read the OSM wiki osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon

Keep mapping .. lots to do.

I note that it has been 6 months since the introduction of the 'permission to use' this data on the Australian Data Catalog. Yet the 'permission' document remains missing. Suggest you spend time getting that done....

Hi,

Are you certain that this Rural Fire Brigade occupies both buildings?

Thanks.
I add the extras after the above message ..
I'll be checking the lot of NSW fire stations and brigades once I'm through doing this 'housekeeping' .. that will take a while. I'' make 2 lists of what OSM has and compare that with the official lists .. then I'll work on the discrepancies (both any missing and any extras).