Deleted.
So too have other faulty relations of yours in this area.

Humm... the issue is that some bus routes use that buss off ramp ... presumably they go around the construction ... in that pdf it says
"Access will be maintained via the Falcon Street and Miller Street off ramps."
Maybe there are only taking the area between the bus off ramp and the expressway? Looks to me like the lane otherwise the buses would stop.

Hi,
Error in relation:

https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=143.87116&lat=-39.77136&zoom=14&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Bing shows the Falcon St Offramp as a bus lane ..Not under construction... The DCS Base Map maybe more upto date. The Maxar imagery is more upto date.

Hi,
Regarding the fixme placed for a left turn from York St to Margret St... Margret St is one way preventing travel in that direction ..so a turn restriction would be redundant.

Ok. I think I have this relation corrected now. Note there was an offset from the roads in the same area - I have corrected that to be the same as the roads already mapped ...

Hi,
Relation 15752535 is wrong. Multipolygon relations outer ways cannot share segments....
See
https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=115.71137&lat=-32.53851&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways
osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Overlapping,_unclosed_member_ways_belonging_to_the_same_role

The changeset comments could be better - see osm.wiki/Good_changeset_comments

No response at all... deleted. Ways are still there - tag them.

Hi,
Relation 15623238, bus route 238: Taronga Zoo Wharf to Balmoral Beach is wrong. It has no bus stops - as least 2 are required for Public Transport Version 2 compliance, one at the start and one at the finish.

Hi
The relation/10603708 is for water not a 'meadow'. The 'meadow' also includes houses and trees. I have reverted this relation back to the previous water entry - 2 members only.

This removes the meadow entry. Suggestion? Map smaller areas as individual meadows - use the roads as barriers not to map meadows over. So there would be at least 3 outers.

Hi
When adding stops/platforms to public transport version 2 routes they must go before the ways and be in sequential order. The ways too must be in sequential order.

Your not interested... fine

Opps
This changed the North Scottsdale Regional Reserve relation... Looks like the northern section of the Great Forester River is used by the reserve boundary...

No need to apologise. And don't worry about making more mistakes - part of being human. Reason why I contact people is to let them know so they can disagree .... or take it onboard.

Hi,

Tree relation/7612020 has been broken by the change in way Way: 528241712.

See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=150.92261&lat=-33.82944&zoom=15&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

Possibly the tree relation is no longer relevant???

Hi,
The residential relation is wrong, there are 2 shared segments.
See https://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=areas&lon=145.99331&lat=-41.08312&zoom=16&baselayer=Geofabrik%20Standard&overlays=duplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways%2Cduplicate_node%2Csingle_node_in_way%2Cduplicate_segment%2Cway_in_multiple_rings%2Cintersection%2Cintersecting_segments%2Cring_not_closed%2Ctouching_rings%2Crole_should_be_inner%2Crole_should_be_outer%2Cinner_with_same_tags%2Cways

The orange bits are the shared segments. I'd simply delete those orange bits making a simply single way that can then have the tags one the way and so no need for the relation.

Hi,

I have made the Nation Bark boundaries conform to the government issued boundaries of 2020 - CAPAD. Please do not change these.

The NSW Golf Club boundary had a gap .. I have closed that gap as best I could using the Nationa Park boundary and imagery.

Note Coast line data in OSM is the high tide mark .. not the low tide .. and it may not be the park nor suburbs boundary.

Hi,
The relation/15820539 is not correct ...
Please read osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#Multipolygon_created_by_only_one_polygon
Bsicly there needs to be an outer area ... and then inner areas - All of these are simple closed ways .. then make the relation. osm.wiki/Relation:multipolygon#iD

Hi,
The relation/14687606 tagged landuse=religious and building=yes? In OSM building=yes mean that the whole are is a building .. see building=*
I think that you possibly mean that there are buildings here. In OSM that characteristic is not mapped, preference is to map the actual buildings. This tagging causes the building that are mapped in this are to be obscured.

I have found the DCS Base Map to be very usefull. And accurate to a great degree.
If you think that an intermittent river bed is a wetland .. so be it.