I'll discuss with my team and let you know if we need any more details regarding this.

I'm very sorry for not responding at that time but when I got this mail, I was doing some other work and later I forgot. Hope you don't mind.And I've started to write the full name of street since i saw the mail. Thank you.

Is it possible if you could fix this bounding box so that I would be able to know the correct way in such cases? Thank you.

Hi,
We did this because at that time we were unknown about merging feature and now we are trying to fix all from the top.
Thank you.

Thank you for the info, we'll fix that.

Sorry for the inconvenience, I tagged this because the name of building is engraved as Hyatt Place.

Thank you for the suggestion and also for reverting the changes. It won't repeat again.

At first, we were deleting the nodes after moving the details and somebody said to not delete the node but keep it to preserve the history and now we are doing as we are told.
We only do what our client tells us to do.

Thank you for the feedback, It won't repeat again.

Sorry for the mistake, I'll keep that in mind.
Thank you for the feedback.

Some of us are working to fix the previous mistakes as per the new set of rules. It may take a little time but we will do that.
Thanks for the feedback.

Thank you for fixing, and I'll be more careful from now on.

At first we kept the information on both nodes and bounding box but after the latest update we don't do that anymore.
Thanks.

We are notatying per guidance from OSM user osm.wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: osm.wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact @Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.

Sorry for the mistakes, it won't repeat from now onwards and thank you for fixing it.

Thank you for fixing it and I'll keep that in mind.

We are notatying per guidance from OSM user osm.wiki/User:Lyx on our Talk for Zartico here: osm.wiki/Talk:Zartico.

What you are suggesting is in conflict with that guidance and the One feature, one OSM element guidance. Please contact @Eddie%20Cannon to clarify.

Thank you for fixing it. I'll be more careful from now on.