Why did you include way/864584312 into Jurtaka relation? Jurtaka goes trough forest.

I agree that multipolygon forests in Latvia are mess, but at least they show approximate situation instead of blank field you left after yourself. If you don't like forest objects than you should have fix them or replace with a better version, not deleting those.

If you like to continue editing I suggest to install JOSM, it's much more powerful and easier to use :)
Also we have telegram channel https://t.me/lvosm
and mailing list https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lv

Sorry if I did that, must be a mistake!
But I see that that industrial zone is out of changeset orange border, maybe it was in different changeset.
https://imgur.com/a/R7Wp59Q

Also please use relations with multipolygons, overlapping ways much harder to update.

Sorry, what was the object id?

No kurienes ir ta tacina?
way/932513505

Nomainiji, bet nepareizi

Reverting

I'm reverting these vandal changes as well!!!

You've broke forest multipolygon!!! I'm reverting changes

Kas te par svistu pievinots? 12 marsruts tur neiet

Majag linku lai parabauditu datu license, jo osm driks izmantot tikai atvertos datus
osm.wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility

Kur to var apskatit?

Sveiki! Kads ir avots nosaukumam "Mežzīļu ceļš"?

Why did you create bicycle route 10 duplicate with wrong data?

Why highway=track where removed? Don't edit if you don't know what are the roads there!

Yes, I don't like that idea myself, when few years ago one of Latvian mappers added E9 route to Latvian coastline, but I don't see any other options. Also it's used in other places like this: osm.org/#map=15/54.4417/12.6697

vajag salabot way/870234862#map=18/56.93187/23.60690

Why this railway is set as disused/abandoned?
Even on orthophoto train is visible on the tracks!!!
way/4411822/history

Kapec vajag bojat relation apvienot celu?
https://osmlab.github.io/osm-deep-history/#/way/678615799