Why would you tagged an area that is clearly sand as a "theme park"? Some of your edit history are not accurate as it seems...

both look like they are in that area
both could work

It seems like a Dollar Tree point node/11711568387.

Hi,

Sorry about the small multipolygon areas, I thought it would be easier to map/manage those areas. But I also get it on a maintainence point of view.

Also I always aim to make my edits accurate, sometimes with the satallite imagery its hard to determine either the parking lot surface was actual a parking lot or one of those temporary parking area seen in construction/maintainence sites.

Thanks for the guidelines, I'll take a look into it. I aswell will cleanup the tags.

The bridge location placement were based on a passby and memory iirc.

https://www.penndot.pa.gov/RegionalOffices/district-4/ConstructionsProjectsAndRoadwork/Pages/SR-84-Bridge-Replacement-Project.aspx

Hi there,
I mapped based on imagery. I mapped 14460268 based on actual natural land patch/area. As 13909443 is mapped based on area ranged on name slough feature, perhaps can be tagged w/o the natural=wetland or a line.
And yes those swamp/island patches can be consider an inner relation of the larger wetland area.

Thanks.

I notice some of the area ways east along the parkway that was once tagged as "name=Leif Erikson Drive and leisure=park" changed to "landuse=transportation". Though there is no render for it. Way=558585173 (Changeset=56355406) as an example.

I noticed other park ways were named "Leif Ericson Drive" and thought it was reasonable to tag it as a park to those landuse tag. Also the original natural tagging didn't seem to be accurate in terms of large wood/scrub patch.

I was not aware of the outdated-ness of ESRI Clarity and now aware of it being an outdated imagery. I do wish it mentioned the year it was currently at. Thanks.

Hi Wireguy, just fixed and closed the Everglades and Francis S. Taylor Wildlife Management Area relation. Thank you for telling me.

Hi PignatelliGiada,

The way/1059592652 is quite large and inaccurate in terms of a lake tag, rendering a flooding in the Everglades.

Hi,
Used USGS topo maps of both old and new. Used it mainly as a reference. The landscape changed so much, there could be some mistakes.

The pavilion is open in the middle with the missing glass roof, so I guess it is technically correct? The description is more towards the old open floor area, which I added just for additional historic information purposes.

What was the point of deleting multiple roadways?

As of today (9/8/2018), the new span was postpone due to safety reasons of the old bridge and still closed for traffic.

The new span is planned to open to traffic to Saturday morning of 9/8/2018.
Making the northern span of I-87 northbound and the southern span of I-87 southbound.

Natural=Grassland isn't an appropriate tag for a suburb.

Theres some node/way problems around the Edgewood Oak Preserve admin borders.

There does not seems to be a park here. Either the lake.